Cited by 242COVID-19 and healthcare impactsCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesEthics in Clinical Research

Impact of COVID-19 on clinical trials and clinical research: A systematic review

Open access
Sathian, Brijesh, Asim, Mohammad, Banerjee, Indrajit, Pizarro, Ana Beatriz, Roy, Bedanta, Van Teijlingen, Edwin R., Nascimento, Israel Júnior Borges do, Alhamad, Hanadi Khamis·2020·Nepal Journal of Epidemiology

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization has reported more than 31,186,000 confirmed cases of coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), including 962,343 deaths, worldwide as on September 21, 2020. The current COVID-19 pandemic is affecting clinical research activities in most parts of the world. The focus on developing a vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 and the treatment of COVID-19 is, in fact, disrupting many upcoming and/or ongoing clinical trials on other diseases around the globe. On March 18, 2020, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued an updated guideline for the conduct of clinical trials during the current health emergency situation. The potential challenges, such as social distancing and quarantines, result in study participants’ inaccessibility and trial personnel for in-person scheduled study visits and/or follow-up. Due to the sudden onset and wide-spread impact of COVID-19, its influence on the management of clinical trials and research necessitates urgent attention. Therefore, our systematic review of the literature aims to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the conduction of clinical trials and research. The search for the relevant articles for review included the keywords "COVID-19” AND "clinical trial" in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Google scholar and Google electronic databases. Key findings include: delaying subject enrollment and operational gaps in most ongoing clinical trials, which in turn has a negative impact on trial programmes and data integrity. Globally, most sites conducting clinical trials other than COVID-19 are experiencing a delay in timelines and a complete halt of operations in lieu of this pandemic, thus affecting clinical research outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3126/nje.v10i3.31622

Cites

13 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sathian, B., Asim, M., Banerjee, I., Pizarro, A. B., Roy, B., Van Teijlingen, E. R., Nascimento, I. J. B. D., & Alhamad, H. K.
Affiliations
  • Hamad Medical Corporation (QA)
  • Hamad General Hospital (QA)
  • Pontificia Universidad Javeriana (CO)
  • Quest International University Perak (MY)
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Corresponding author
Sathian, Brijesh
Venue
Nepal Journal of Epidemiology
Published
2020-09-30
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
878-887
ISSN
2091-0800 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3091584968
Cited by
242
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 49 · 2022: 53 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nepal Journal of Epidemiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bournemouth University Research Online (Bournemouth University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, clinical trials, social distancing, quarantine, data integrity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review