The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hydrogeologic and hydrochemical framework, south-central Great Basin, Nevada-California, with special reference to the Nevada Test Site
Open accessAbstract
Intensely fractured Precambrian and Paleozoic carbonate and clastic rocks and block-faulted Cenozoic volcanic and sedimentary strata in the Nevada Test Site are divided into 10 hydrogeologic units.Three of these the lower clastic aquitard, the lower carbonate aquifer, and the tuff aquitard control the regional movement of ground water.The coefficients of fracture transmissibility of these rocks are, respectively, less than 1,000, 1,000 to 900,000, and less than 200 gallons per day per foot; interstitial permeability is negligible.Solution caverns are locally present in the carbonate aquifer, but regional movement of water is controlled by variations in fracture transmissibility and by structural juxtaposition of the aquifer and the lower clastic aquitard.Water circulates freely to depths of at least 1,500 feet beneath the top of the aquifer and up to 4,200 feet below land surface.Synthesis of hydrogeologic, hydrochemical, and isotopic data suggests that an area of at least 4,500 square miles (including 10 intermontane valleys) is hydraulically integrated into one ground-water basin, the Ash Meadows basin, by interbasin movement of ground water through the widespread carbonate aquifer.Discharge from this basin a minimum of about 17,000 acre-feet annually occurs along a fault-controlled spring line at Ash Meadows in east-central Amargosa Desert.Intrabasin movement of water between Cenozoic aquifers and the lower carbonate aquifer is controlled by the tuff aquitard, the basal Cenozoic hydrogeologic unit.Such movement significantly influences the chemistry of water in the carbonate aquifer.Ground-water velocity through the tuff aquitard in Yucca Flat is less than 1 foot per year.Velocity through the lower carbonate aquifer ranges from an estimated 0.02 to 200 feet per day, depending upon geographic position within the flow system.Within the Nevada Test Site, ground water moves southward and southwestward toward Ash Meadows. C2 HYDROLOGY OF NUCLEAR TEST SITESThe scope of the report is broad in view of the complexities of the geology, the vastness of the study area, and the absence of previous detailed hydrogeologic studies of similar terrane.Yet, the types and quantity of data obtained during this investigation are seldom available in hydrogeologic studies.In addition to standard hydrologic data, a wealth of geologic, geophysical, geochemical, and isotopic data were used to supplement interpretations of the hydrologic data.To a first approximation, therefore, the objectives of the study are believed to have been accomplished.The development of ground-water supplies was an important byproduct of the investigation; more than half the test holes are used as water wells.This report does not discuss the exploration for, and development of, new water supplies, although many of the data and interpretations will aid others in such tasks.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Study and interpretation of the chemical characteristics of natural water
(1959) · doi:10.3133/wsp1473_ed1 · Cited by 5,749
A graphic procedure in the geochemical interpretation of water‐analyses
(1944) · Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union · doi:10.1029/tr025i006p00914 · Cited by 5,593
A theoretical analysis of groundwater flow in small drainage basins
Tóth, J. (1963) · Journal of Geophysical Research · doi:10.1029/jz068i016p04795 · Cited by 1,660
Flow in Heterogeneous Porous Media
Warren, J. E., & Price, H. S. (1961) · Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal · doi:10.2118/1579-g · Cited by 453
Hydrochemical facies and ground-water flow patterns in northern part of Atlantic Coastal Plain
Back, W. (1966) · Professional Paper · doi:10.3133/pp498a · Cited by 414
A regional interbasin groundwater system in the White River Area, southeastern Nevada
Eakin, T. E. (1966) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr002i002p00251 · Cited by 109
Cited by
Plummer, L. N., Busenberg, E., & Riggs, A. C. (2000) · Aquatic Geochemistry · doi:10.1023/a:1009627710476 · Cited by 49
Framework for remote sensing and modelling of lithium-brine deposit formation
Rossi, C., Bateson, L., Bayaraa, M., Butcher, A., Ford, J., & Hughes, A. (2022) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs14061383 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Winograd, I. J., & Thordarson, W.
- Venue
- Professional Paper
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 1975
- ISSN
- 1044-9612 (ISSN-L)
- 2330-7102
- OpenAlex
- W1593546438
- Cited by
- 517
- References
- 6
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.