The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Potential postwildfire debris-flow hazards: a prewildfire evaluation for the Sandia and Manzano Mountains and surrounding areas, central New Mexico
Open accessAbstract
Wildfire can drastically increase the probability of debris flows, a potentially hazardous and destructive form of mass wasting, in landscapes that have otherwise been stable throughout recent history. Although there is no way to know the exact location, extent, and severity of wildfire, or the subsequent rainfall intensity and duration before it happens, probabilities of fire and debris-flow occurrence for different locations can be estimated with geospatial analysis and modeling efforts. The purpose of this report is to provide information on which watersheds might constitute the most serious, potential, debris-flow hazards in the event of a large-scale wildfire and subsequent rainfall in the Sandia and Manzano Mountains. Potential probabilities and estimated volumes of postwildfire debris flows in the unburned Sandia and Manzano Mountains and surrounding areas were estimated using empirical debris-flow models developed by the U.S. Geological Survey in combination with fire behavior and burn probability models developed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service. The locations of the greatest debris-flow hazards correlate with the areas of steepest slopes and simulated crown-fire behavior. The four subbasins with the highest computed debris-flow probabilities (greater than 98 percent) were all in the Manzano Mountains, two flowing east and two flowing west. Volumes in sixteen subbasins were greater than 50,000 square meters and most of these were in the central Manzanos and the western facing slopes of the Sandias. Five subbasins on the west-facing slopes of the Sandia Mountains, four of which have downstream reaches that lead into the outskirts of the City of Albuquerque, are among subbasins in the 98th percentile of integrated relative debris-flow hazard rankings. The bulk of the remaining subbasins in the 98th percentile of integrated relative debris-flow hazard rankings are located along the highest and steepest slopes of the Manzano Mountains. One of the subbasins is several miles upstream from the community of Tajique and another is several miles upstream from the community of Manzano, both on the eastern slopes of the Manzano Mountains. This prewildfire assessment approach is valuable to resource managers because the analysis of the debris-flow threat is made before a wildfire occurs, which facilitates prewildfire management, planning, and mitigation. In northern New Mexico, widespread watershed restoration efforts are being carried out to safeguard vital watersheds against the threat of catastrophic wildfire. This study was initiated to help select ideal locations for the restoration efforts that could have the best return on investment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Severe wildfires can result in significant and costly impacts to municipal watersheds, ranging from increased sedimentation to increased likelihood of debris flows to damage of water delivery infrastructure and interruption of service.
“Severe wildfires can result in significant and costly impacts to municipal watersheds, ranging from increased sedimentation to increased likelihood of debris flows to damage of water delivery infrastructure and interruption of service, prompting additional interest in risk mitigation options (Warziniack and Thompson 2013;Tillery et al. 2014).”
From Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management (2015) · cites this paper as Tillery et al. 2014
The Introduction states that wildfire can drastically increase debris-flow probability and threaten water conveyances critical to municipal supplies. It does not establish the claimed increased sedimentation, costs, or interruption of water service; the Limitations of Hazard Assessment discusses mitigation planning, not those impacts. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels
Rothermel, R. C. (1972) · doi:10.2737/int-rp-115 · Cited by 2,247
A Project for Monitoring Trends in Burn Severity
Eidenshink, J., Schwind, B., Brewer, K., Zhu, Z.-L., Quayle, B., & Howard, S. (2007) · Fire Ecology · doi:10.4996/fireecology.0301003 · Cited by 1,423
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Cannon, S.H., and Gartner, J.E., 2005, Wildfire-related debris flow from a hazards perspective, chap. 15 of Jacob, M., and Hungr, O., eds., Debris-flow hazards and Related Phenom- ena: Berlin, Praxis, Springer-Verlag, p. 363-385.
- Finney, M.A., 2006, An overview of FlamMap fire model- ing capabilities, in Fuels management-How to measure success, Portland, Oregon. Proceedings: Fort Collins, Colo: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, p. 213-220.
- Julyan, R.H., and Stuever, M, 2005, Field guide to the Sandia Mountains, University of New Mexico press, p. 127.
- Kean, J.W., Staley, D.M., and Cannon, S.H., 2011, In situ mea- surements of post-fire debris flows in southern California- Comparisons of the timing and magnitude of 24 debris-flow events with rainfall and soil moisture conditions: Journal of Geophysical Research, v. 116, 21 p. [Also available at doi:10.1029/2011JF002005.] · DOI
- Short, K. C., 2013, A spatial database of wildfires in the United States, 1992-2011: Earth Systems Science Data, v. 6, p. 1-27, doi:10.5194/essd-6-1-2014, 2014. · DOI
- Abataglou, J.T. 2011, Development of gridded surface meteorological data for ecological applications and mod- elling: International Journal of Climatology, v. 22, no.1, p.121-131.
- Andrews, P.L., Loftsgaarden, D.O., and Bradshaw, L.S., 2003, Evaluation of fire danger rating indexes using logistic regression and percentile analysis: International Journal of Wildland Fire, v. 12, no. 2, p. 213-226.
- Berman, M., and Diggle, P.J., 1989, Estimating weighted inte- grals of the second-order intensity of spatial point patterns: Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, v. B51, p. 81-92.
- Diggle, P.J., 2003, Statistical analysis of spatial point patterns (2d ed.): London, Hodder Education Publishers.
- Ebdon, D., 1985, Statistics in geography-A practical approach (2d ed.): Wiley-Blackwell, 242 p. Esri (Environmental Systems Resource Institute), 2011, Arc- Map 10.1: Redlands, California.
- Finney, M.A., 2002, Fire growth using minimum travel time methods: Canadian Journal of Forest Research, v. 32, no. 8, p. 1420-1424.
- Finney, M.A., 2006, An overview of FlamMap fire model- ing capabilities, in Fuels management-How to measure success: conference proceedings, Portland, Oregon, March 28-30, 2006, Proceedings RMRS-P-41: Fort Collins, Colo., U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, p. 213-220. (647 KB; 13 p.)
- Keeley, J.E., 2009, Fire intensity, fire severity and burn severity-A brief review and suggested usage: International Journal of Wildland Fire, v. 18, no. 1, p. 116-126.
- Lillesand, T.M., Kieffer, R.W., and Chipman, J.W., 2004, Remote sensing and image interpretation (5th ed.): John Wiley and Sons, 750 p.
- Melton, M.A., 1965, The geomorphic and paleoclimatic sig- nificance of alluvial deposits in southern Arizona: Journal of Geology, v. 73, p. 1-38.
- Parsons, A., Jarvis, B., and Orleman, A., 2002, Mapping of post-wildfire burned severity using remote sensing and GIS, in 22nd Annual Esri Conference, September, 2002: Redlands, California, Proceedings, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Inc. [Also available at http://proceed- ings.esri.com/library/userconf/proc02/pap0431/p0431.htm.
- Scott, J.H., 1998, Sensitivity analysis of a method for assess- ing crown fire hazard in the northern Rocky Mountains, USA, in Third International Conference on Forest Fire Research and 14th Conference on Fire and Forest Meteorol- ogy, Proceedings: v. 14, p. 2517-2532.
- Short, K.C., 2014, A spatial database of wildfires in the United States, 1992-2011: Earth System Science Data, v. 6, p. 1-27, [Also available at doi:10.5194/essd-6-1-2014. · DOI · Paper page
- Van Wagner, C.E., 1977, Conditions for the start and spread of crown fire: Canadian Journal of Forest Research, v. 7, no. 1, p. 23-34.
- Verdin, K.L., and Greenlee, S., 2003, Continuous parameter- ization using EDNA, in Esri User's Conference, San Diego, Calif., 2003, Proceedings: Redlands, Calif., Esri, accessed June 25, 2012, at http://gis.esri.com/library/userconf/ proc03/p0617.pdf.
- Verdin, K.L., and Worstell, B., 2008, A fully distributed implementation of mean annual streamflow regional regres- sion equations: Journal of the American Water Resources Association, v. 44, p. 1537-1547, [Also available at doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2008.00258.x. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Negative consequences of positive feedbacks in US wildfire management
Calkin, D. E., Thompson, M. P., & Finney, M. A. (2015) · Forest Ecosystems · doi:10.1186/s40663-015-0033-8 · Cited by 323
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Tillery, A. C., Haas, J. R., Miller, L. W., Scott, J. H., & Thompson, M. P.
- Venue
- Scientific Investigations Report
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 2014
- ISSN
- 2328-031X (ISSN-L)
- 2328-0328
- OpenAlex
- W1563160593
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Scientific investigations report (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Geological Survey
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Landslides and related hazards
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Forestry › Tree Root and Stability Studies
- Keywords
- forest fires, debris flow hazard assessment, Sandia Mountains, Manzano Mountains, crown fire, burn probability, debris flow volume estimation, watershed restoration, hazard ranking, slope gradient
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review