Cited by 180Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementForest Management and Policy

A spatial database of wildfires in the United States, 1992-2011

Open access
Short, K. C.·2014·Earth System Science Data

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract. The statistical analysis of wildfire activity is a critical component of national wildfire planning, operations, and research in the United States (US). However, there are multiple federal, state, and local entities with wildfire protection and reporting responsibilities in the US, and no single, unified system of wildfire record keeping exists. To conduct even the most rudimentary interagency analyses of wildfire numbers and area burned from the authoritative systems of record, one must harvest records from dozens of disparate databases with inconsistent information content. The onus is then on the user to check for and purge redundant records of the same fire (i.e., multijurisdictional incidents with responses reported by several agencies or departments) after pooling data from different sources. Here we describe our efforts to acquire, standardize, error-check, compile, scrub, and evaluate the completeness of US federal, state, and local wildfire records from 1992–2011 for the national, interagency Fire Program Analysis (FPA) application. The resulting FPA Fire-Occurrence Database (FPA FOD) includes nearly 1.6 million records from the 20 yr period, with values for at least the following core data elements: location, at least as precise as a Public Land Survey System section (2.6 km2 grid), discovery date, and final fire size. The FPA FOD is publicly available from the Research Data Archive of the US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (doi:10.2737/RDS-2013-0009). While necessarily incomplete in some aspects, the database is intended to facilitate fairly high-resolution geospatial analysis of US wildfire activity over the past two decades, based on available information from the authoritative systems of record.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/essd-6-1-2014

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Within the US there are detailed data on the location, date and ignition source for most fires.

    “Within the US there are detailed data on the location, date and ignition source for most fires (Short, 2014).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Short, 2014

    The Abstract and §2.1 (pages not provided) describe a US wildfire database for 1992–2011 with location and discovery date for nearly 1.6 million records; §2.2.1 describes standardized fire-cause codes. But cause was not required for inclusion, and §4 notes substantial gaps in non-federal records. The paper therefore does not establish that all three details are available for most US fires. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Inter-annual variations in mean US fire weather season length were significantly correlated with variation in annual burned area reported by the US National Interagency Fire Center over 1979-2013 and 1992-2013 (ρ=0.679 and 0.683, P<0.001).

    “Inter-annual variations in mean US fire weather season length were significantly correlated with variation in annual burned area reported by the US National Interagency Fire Center44 over the full time series from 1979 to 2013 and also from 1992 to 2013, when fire occurrence data quality was highest45 (ρ=0.679 and 0.683, respectively, P<0.001).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Andrews, P.: Fire danger rating and fire behaviour prediction in the United States, in: Proceedings of the Fifth NRIFD Sympo- sium, International Symposium on Forest Fire Protection, Mi- taka, Tokyo, Japan, 30 November-2 December, 106-117, 2005.
  2. Bunton, D. R.: Wildland fire and weather information data ware- house, in: Proceedings of the Seventh Symposium on Systems Analysis on Forest Resources, Traverse City, MI, USA, 28-31 May 1997, USDA Forest Service, North Central Forest Exper- iment Station, St. Paul, MN, USA, General Technical Report GTR-NC-205, 297-302, 2000.
  3. Davis, B. H. and Miller, C.: What if we didn't suppress fire? in: Proceedings of the 2009 George Wright Society Biennial Con- ference on Parks, Protected Areas, and Cultural Sites, Portland, OR, USA, 1-6 March 2009, 131-134, 2010.
  4. Johnston, J. S. and Klick, J.: Fire suppression policy, weather, and Western wildfire trends, in: Wildire Policy: Law and Economics Perspectives, edited by: Bradshaw, K. M. and Leuck, D., RFF Press, New York, NY, USA, 159-177, 2012.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Short, K. C.
Affiliations
Rocky Mountain Research Station (US)
Corresponding author
Short, K. C.
Venue
Earth System Science Data
Published
2014-01-03
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
1-27
ISSN
  • 1866-3508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1866-3516
OpenAlex
W2154823382
Cited by
180
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 1
FWCI
16.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Earth system science data (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Colorado State University
  • Arizona State University
  • Washington State University
  • Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources
  • Michigan Department of Natural Resources
  • ICAR - National Agricultural Science Fund
  • U.S. Forest Service
  • California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Forest Management and Policy
Keywords
forest fires, spatial databases, burned area, data standardization, data completeness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review