The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
PRMS-IV, the precipitation-runoff modeling system, version 4
Open accessAbstract
Computer models that simulate the hydrologic cycle at a watershed scale facilitate assessment of variability in climate, biota, geology, and human activities on water availability and flow. This report describes an updated version of the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System. The Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System is a deterministic, distributed-parameter, physical-process-based modeling system developed to evaluate the response of various combinations of climate and land use on streamflow and general watershed hydrology. Several new model components were developed, and all existing components were updated, to enhance performance and supportability. This report describes the history, application, concepts, organization, and mathematical formulation of the Precipitation-Runoff Modeling System and its model components. This updated version provides improvements in (1) system flexibility for integrated science, (2) verification of conservation of water during simulation, (3) methods for spatial distribution of climate boundary conditions, and (4) methods for simulation of soil-water flow and storage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I — A discussion of principles
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6 · Cited by 23,674
Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass
Penman, H. L. (1948) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1948.0037 · Cited by 7,307
On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters
PRIESTLEY, C. H. B., & TAYLOR, R. J. (1972) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1972)100<0081:otaosh>2.3.co;2 · Cited by 6,574
Reference Crop Evapotranspiration from Temperature
Hargreaves, G. H., & Samani, Z. A. (1985) · Applied Engineering in Agriculture · doi:10.13031/2013.26773 · Cited by 4,574
Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., & Gupta, V. (1992) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/91wr02985 · Cited by 3,310
Maximal Flow Through a Network
Ford, L. R., & Fulkerson, D. R. (1956) · Canadian Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.4153/cjm-1956-045-5 · Cited by 2,410
Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization
Duan, Q. Y., Gupta, V. K., & Sorooshian, S. (1993) · Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications · doi:10.1007/bf00939380 · Cited by 1,722
On the Computation of Saturation Vapor Pressure
Murray, F. W. (1967) · Journal of Applied Meteorology · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1967)006<0203:otcosv>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,134
History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation
Hargreaves, G. H., & Allen, R. G. (2003) · Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering · doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9437(2003)129:1(53 · Cited by 1,082
Estimating Evapotranspiration from Solar Radiation
Jensen, M. E., & Haise, H. R. (1963) · Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division · doi:10.1061/jrcea4.0000287 · Cited by 943
Statistical Methods in Water Resources
Gotway, C. A. (1994) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1994.10485818 · Cited by 872
An Experimental Investigation of Runoff Production in Permeable Soils
Dunne, T., & Black, R. D. (1970) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr006i002p00478 · Cited by 746
Precipitation-runoff modeling system; user's manual
(1983) · doi:10.3133/wri834238 · Cited by 632
Lu, J., Sun, G., McNulty, S. G., & Amatya, D. M. (2005) · Journal of the American Water Resources Association · doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb03759.x · Cited by 616
Automatic calibration of conceptual rainfall-runoff models: sensitivity to calibration data
Yapo, P. O., Gupta, H. V., & Sorooshian, S. (1996) · Journal of Hydrology · doi:10.1016/0022-1694(95)02918-4 · Cited by 610
Niswonger, R. G., Prudic, D. E., & Regan, R. S. (2006) · Techniques and Methods · doi:10.3133/tm6a19 · Cited by 254
Self-citationEfficient subspace probabilistic parameter optimization for catchment models
Kuczera, G. (1997) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/96wr02671 · Cited by 198
Scheduling Irrigations Using Climate-Crop-Soil Data
Jensen, M. E., Robb, D. C. N., & Franzoy, C. E. (1970) · Journal of the Irrigation and Drainage Division · doi:10.1061/jrcea4.0000699 · Cited by 190
Development and testing of snow pack energy balance equations
Anderson, E. A. (1968) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr004i001p00019 · Cited by 185
Temporal variations in frost‐free season in the United States: 1895–2000
Kunkel, K. E., Easterling, D. R., Hubbard, K. G., & Redmond, K. T. (2004) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2003gl018624 · Cited by 184
Use of Regional Climate Model Output for Hydrologic Simulations
Hay, L. E., Clark, M. P., Wilby, R. L., Gutowski, W. J., Leavesley, G. H., Pan, Z., Arritt, R. W., & Takle, E. S. (2002) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0571:uorcmo>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 181
Self-citationA Multistep Automatic Calibration Scheme for River Forecasting Models
Hogue, T. S., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, H. V., Holz, A., & Braatz, D. T. (2000) · Journal of Hydrometeorology · Cited by 163
Potential solar beam irradiation on slopes
Frank, E. C., & Lee, R. (1966) · Cited by 62
Cited by
The sensitivity of simulated streamflow to individual hydrologic processes across North America
Mai, J., Craig, J. R., Tolson, B. A., & Arsenault, R. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28010-7 · Cited by 63
Metadata
- Authors
- Markstrom, S. L., Regan, R. S., Hay, L. E., Viger, R. J., Webb, R. M., Payn, R. A., & LaFontaine, J. H.
- Venue
- Techniques and Methods
- Publisher
- US Geological Survey
- Published
- 2015
- ISSN
- 2328-7047 (ISSN-L)
- 2328-7055
- OpenAlex
- W200110011
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 23
- Type
- report
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
