The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations
Abstract
A collection of essays based on Smith's unique rebel sociology. Smith turns wit and common sense on the prevailing discourses of sociology, political economy, and popular culture to inquire directly into the actualities of peoples’ lives.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nakata, M. (2007) · The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education · doi:10.1017/s1326011100004646 · Cited by 759
Exploring the promises of intersectionality for advancing women's health research
Hankivsky, O., Reid, C., Cormier, R., Varcoe, C., Clark, N., Benoit, C., & Brotman, S. (2010) · International Journal for Equity in Health · doi:10.1186/1475-9276-9-5 · Cited by 346
Mainstreaming politics: Gendering practices and feminist theory
Bacchi, C., & Eveline, J. (2012) · University of Adelaide Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/upo9780980672381 · Cited by 273
Agencies in Technology Design: Feminist Reconfigurations*
Suchman, L. (2020) · Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics · doi:10.4324/9781003074991-32 · Cited by 115
Varcoe, C., & Irwin, L. G. (2004) · Qualitative Sociology · doi:10.1023/b:quas.0000015545.82803.90 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, D. E.
- Venue
- University of Toronto Press eBooks
- Publisher
- University of Toronto Press
- Published
- 1999-12-31
- OpenAlex
- W1979402293
- Cited by
- 1,190
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 53.17
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3138/9781442683747
- The paper
- Smith, D. E. (1999). Writing the Social: Critique, Theory, and Investigations. University of Toronto Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442683747
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
