Cited by 9Criminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisCriminal Justice and PenologyIndigenous Peoples' Rights and Law

Re-Imagining “Serving Time” in Indigenous Communities

Murdocca, Carmela·2020·Canadian Journal of Women and the Law

Abstract

L’article 81 de la Loi sur le système correctionnel et la mise en liberté sous condition permet aux collectivités autochtones de superviser le soin et la garde des délinquants autochtones. Bien que l’article 81 ne décrive pas comment les collectivités autochtones doivent s’y prendre, la prestation de garde et de soin prend communément la forme de centres de guérison, communément appelés pavillons de ressourcement. Cette loi a le potentiel de permettre aux collectivités autochtones, dans tout ce qu’elles entreprennent, de configurer leurs propres accords en vertu de l’article 81 de façon à ce qu’ils correspondent à leurs capacités et à leurs besoins spécifiques. Malgré le potentiel de l’article 81, peu de programmes de cette nature sont offerts aux femmes autochtones détenues dans des prisons fédérales. Cet article présente les résultats de deux séances d’engagement communautaires avec des femmes autochtones et des chefs de diverses communautés autochtones du Manitoba au sujet des femmes autochtones détenues dans des prisons fédérales qui purgent leur peine dans leur collectivité. L’article décrit les connaissances et les points de vue des communautés qui ont participé aux séances d’engagement et démontre la nécessité de faire appel à l’expertise autochtone et de mieux comprendre sur le plan local les obstacles, les possibilités et les limites de l’article 81.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3138/cjwl.32.1.02

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. See Department of the Solicitor General, Influences on Canadian Correctional Reform: Working Papers of the Correctional Law Review, 1986 to 1988, by Wayne Easter, Catalogue No JS42-111/2002E (Ottawa: Solicitor General Canada, 2002) at 3 (Minister’s Preface) <https://naacj.org/en/pdf/res_influences_canadian_correctional_reform.pdf>
  2. For this part of the education workshop, a short video excerpt about individual experiences of the Buffalo Sage Wellness House and the Stan Daniels Healing Centre was used to spark conversation and sharing. See Aboriginal Peoples Television Network, “First Contact: The Road to Healing” (Season 1, Episode 3) at 15:34 to 25:55 (video) <https://aptn.ca/firstcontact/episode-guide/season-1/>
  3. This article was also submitted for review by, and feedback from, all of the women and community leaders who participated in the community engagement sessions prior to publication.
  4. Patricia A Monture, “Confronting Power: Aboriginal Women and Justice Reform” (2006) 25:3/4 Canadian Woman Studies 25 at 27, citing Fran Sugar & Lana Fox, “Nistum Peyako Seht'wawin Iskwewak: Breaking Chains” (1989–90) 3:2 Canadian Journal of Women and the Law 465 at 469.

Authors
Murdocca, C.
Corresponding author
Murdocca, Carmela
Venue
Canadian Journal of Women and the Law
Published
2020-03
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
31-60
ISSN
  • 0832-8781 (ISSN-L)
  • 1911-0235
OpenAlex
W3013794120
Cited by
9
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Law › Criminal Justice and Penology
  • Social Sciences › Law › Indigenous Peoples' Rights and Law
Keywords
indigenous peoples, conditional release, community participation, federal prisons, Manitoba

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review