Cited by 6COVID-19 and Mental HealthEducation and Military IntegrationHealth disparities and outcomes

Soldiering on only goes so far: how a qualitative study on veteran loneliness in New Zealand influenced that support during COVID-19 lockdown

Open access
Austin, Guy, Calvert, Toby, Fasi, Natasha, Fuimaono, Ryder, Galt, Timothy, Jackson, Sam, Lepaio, Leanda, Liu, Ben +5 more·2020·Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health

Abstract

Introduction: On April 25, 2020, Veterans’ Affairs in New Zealand (NZ) contacted approximately 3,000 of 8,000 known military Veterans by phone during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic to ensure they were safe during the government-imposed lockdown. The impetus to this initiative were the findings of a cross-sectional quantitative survey of NZ Veterans, followed by the qualitative survey reported here, both carried out in 2019. The former report found 33% of 89 respondents were lonely and reported barriers to seeking support, and over half of Veterans felt uncomfortable accessing it. Methods: To understand the factors underlying loneliness, a qualitative survey was developed based on the barriers previously identified and a literature review. A purposeful sample based on gender, age, and ethnicity identified 20 respondents from the initial survey: 10 lonely and 10 non-lonely. Interviews were followed by an inductive thematic analysis, and themes and sub-themes were developed. Results: Ten of the 20 potential participants responded: 6 lonely and 4 non-lonely. Social and geographic isolation, problems with re-integration into the civilian community, and health problems were found to contribute to Veteran loneliness. Social connectedness, particularly to service peers, was the primary mitigating factor. Barriers included stoicism and perceptions of ineffective and inaccessible services. Inequity in the Veteran support system also emerged as a barrier for Veterans who had not deployed on operational missions. Discussion: During the pandemic, social connectedness will have decreased, and loneliness increased. Designing interventions with these factors in mind, and ensuring equity of access to support, should help combat Veteran loneliness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3138/jmvfh-co19-0007

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Austin, G., Calvert, T., Fasi, N., Fuimaono, R., Galt, T., Jackson, S., Lepaio, L., Liu, B., Ritchie, D., Theis, N., Dockerty, J., Doolan-Noble, F., & McBride, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
  • Department of General Practice and Rural Health, University of Otago, Dunedin, Otago, New Zealand
Corresponding author
McBride, David
Venue
Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health
Published
2020-11-01
Volume
6
Issue
S2
Pages
60-69
ISSN
2368-7924 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3120306126
Cited by
6
References
14
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Military Veteran and Family Health (publishedVersion)
Funders
Royal British Legion
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
COVID-19 lockdown, social isolation, social connectedness, reintegration into civilian life, barriers to support services, Stoicism, mental health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review