Cited by 132Education and Military IntegrationPosttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

Life in and after the Armed Forces: social networks and mental health in the UK military

Hatch, Stephani L., Harvey, Samuel B., Dandeker, Christopher, Burdett, Howard, Greenberg, Neil, Fear, Nicola T., Wessely, Simon·2013·Sociology of Health & Illness

Abstract

This study focuses on the influence of structural aspects of social integration (social networks and social participation outside work) on mental health (common mental disorders (CMD), that is, depression and anxiety symptoms, post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms and alcohol misuse). This study examines differences in levels of social integration and associations between social integration and mental health among service leavers and personnel still in service. Data were collected from regular serving personnel (n = 6511) and regular service leavers (n = 1753), from a representative cohort study of the Armed Forces in the UK. We found that service leavers reported less social participation outside work and a general disengagement with military social contacts in comparison to serving personnel. Service leavers were more likely to report CMD and PTSD symptoms. The increased risk of CMD but not PTSD symptoms, was partially accounted for by the reduced levels of social integration among the service leavers. Maintaining social networks in which most members are still in the military is associated with alcohol misuse for both groups, but it is related to CMD and PTSD symptoms for service leavers only.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/1467-9566.12022

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hatch, S. L., Harvey, S. B., Dandeker, C., Burdett, H., Greenberg, N., Fear, N. T., & Wessely, S.
Affiliations
King's College London (GB)
Venue
Sociology of Health & Illness
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-01-29
Volume
35
Issue
7
Pages
1045-1064
ISSN
  • 0141-9889 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-9566
OpenAlex
W2148988246
Cited by
132
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 1
FWCI
32.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sociology of Health & Illness (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust/Institute of Cancer Research
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10003)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education and Military Integration
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
military personnel, social integration, social networks, social participation (health and rehabilitation), common mental disorders, depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder, alcohol abuse, British armed forces
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcoholism, Anxiety Disorders, Depression, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Mental Health, Military Personnel, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Veterans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review