Cited by 23Social Media in Health EducationVeterinary Practice and Education StudiesImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Teaching Veterinary Professionalism in the Face(book) of Change

Coe, Jason B., Weijs, Cynthia A., Muise, Amy, Christofides, Emily, Desmarais, Serge·2011·Journal of Veterinary Medical Education

Abstract

Facebook has been identified as the preferred social networking site among postsecondary students. Repeated findings in the social networking literature have suggested that postsecondary students practice high personal self-disclosure on Facebook and tend not to use privacy settings that would limit public access. This study identified and reviewed Facebook profiles for 805 veterinarians-in-training enrolled at four veterinary colleges across Canada. Of these, 265 (32.9%) were categorized as having low exposure, 286 (35.5%) were categorized as having medium exposure, and 254 (31.6%) were categorized as having high exposure of information. Content analysis on a sub-sample (n=80) of the high-exposure profiles revealed publicly available unprofessional content, including indications of substance use and abuse, obscene comments, and breaches of client confidentiality. Regression analysis revealed that an increasing number of years to graduation and having a publicly visible wall were both positively associated with having a high-exposure profile. Given the rapid uptake of social media in recent years, veterinary educators should be aware of and begin to educate students on the associated risks and repercussions of blurring one's private life and one's emerging professional identity through personal online disclosures.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3138/jvme.38.4.353

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Coe, J. B., Weijs, C. A., Muise, A., Christofides, E., & Desmarais, S.
Affiliations
Ontario Veterinary College (CA)
Venue
Journal of Veterinary Medical Education
Published
2011-12
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
353-359
ISSN
  • 0748-321X (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7218
OpenAlex
W2000519433
Cited by
23
References
24
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Veterinary Medical Education (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Social Media in Health Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
Facebook, social networking sites, veterinary students, professionalism, online self-disclosure, privacy settings, professional identity, substance use, client confidentiality, social media risks, veterinary education
MeSH terms
Attitude of Health Personnel, Canada, Education, Veterinary, Ethics, Professional, Female, Humans, Male, Schools, Veterinary, Self Disclosure, Students, Health Occupations, Teaching, Social Networking, Social Media

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review