Cited by 15Physical Activity and HealthNon-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Inter-instrument reliability and agreement of Fitbit charge measurements of heart rate and activity at rest, during the modified Canadian aerobic fitness test, and in recovery

Open access
Nazari, Goris, MacDermid, Joy C., Sinden, Kathryn E., Richardson, Julie, Tang, Ada·2019·Physiotherapy Canada

Abstract

Purpose: We determined the inter-instrument reliability and agreement parameters of the Fitbit Charge Heart Rate (Charge HR) device during three phases: rest, modified Canadian Aerobic Fitness Test (mCAFT), and recovery. Method: We recruited 60 participants for this cross-sectional measurement study using convenience and snowball sampling approaches. The performance of the Charge HR was assessed throughout the rest, mCAFT, and recovery phases. To establish inter-instrument reliability, the Charge HR variables – heart rate, steps taken, and energy expenditures – were compared with those for two other devices: the Zephyr BioHarness (ZB) for heart rate and the Fitbit One for steps taken and energy expenditure. Measurements were recorded every 30 seconds. Results: At rest, the inter-instrument intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) (standard error of measurement [SEM]) for the Charge HR versus the ZB was ≥ 0.97 (range, min–max, 1.02–1.32). During the mCAFT and in recovery, the ICCs (SEMs) for the Charge HR and the ZB were ≥ 0.89 (range, min–max, 1.30–3.98) and ≥ 0.68 (range, min–max, 3.58–8.35), respectively. During the mCAFT only, the number of steps taken and the energy expenditure recorded by the Charge HR and the Fitbit One displayed ICCs (SEMs) of 0.97 (83.00) and 0.77 (14.70), respectively. The average agreement differences in heart rate in this pair-wise device comparison indicated mean differences of –0.20, 4.00, and 1.00 beats per minute at rest, during the mCAFT, and in recovery, respectively. Conclusions: The Charge HR heart rate variable demonstrated excellent inter-instrument reliability compared with the ZB and provided good levels of agreement. The steps taken and energy expenditure variables displayed excellent reliability measures between Charge HR and Fitbit One. Our findings may be used to capture field-based wireless measures of heart rate in various phases and provide information about possibly using the Charge HR and ZB devices interchangeably.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3138/ptc.2018-25

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]1. Fitbit [homepage on the Internet]. San Francisco: Fitbit; 2015. [cited 2016 Apr]. Fitbit Charge HR Wireless Heart Rate + Activity Wrist Band. Fitbit Charge HR TM Product Manual Version 1.0 Available from: https://staticcs.fitbit.com/content/assets/help/manuals/manual_charge_hr_en_US.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  2. [2]2. American College of Sports Medicine. Health-related physical fitness assessment manual. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2013. [Google Scholar]
  3. [5]5. Zephyr Technology. BioHarness 3.0 user manual [Internet]. Annapolis (MD): Zephyr Technology; 2012. [cited 2016 Apr]. Available from: https://www.zephyranywhere.com/media/download/bioharness3-user-manual.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  4. [6]6. Fitbit. Fitbit one wireless activity + sleep tracker: user manual [Internet]. San Francisco: Fitbit; 2012. Available from: https://staticcs.fitbit.com/content/assets/help/manuals/manual_one_en_US.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  5. [16]16. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology. The Canadian physical activity, fitness and lifestyle appraisal. 3rd ed. Ottawa: Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology; 2010. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nazari, G., MacDermid, J. C., Sinden, K. E., Richardson, J., & Tang, A.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • Lakehead University (CA)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Corresponding author
Nazari, Goris
Venue
Physiotherapy Canada
Published
2019-08
Volume
71
Issue
3
Pages
197-206
ISSN
  • 0300-0508 (ISSN-L)
  • 1708-8313
OpenAlex
W2916911087
Cited by
15
References
20
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physiotherapy Canada (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
wearable heart rate monitor, step count, energy expenditure, heart rate recovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review