Cited by 88Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringPhysical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Validity of wrist-worn photoplethysmography devices to measure heart rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zhang, Yanan, Weaver, R. Glenn, Armstrong, Bridget, Burkart, Sarah, Zhang, Shuxin, Beets, Michael W.·2020·Journal of Sports Sciences

Abstract

Heart rate (HR), when combined with accelerometry, can dramatically improve estimates of energy expenditure and sleep. Advancements in technology, via the development and introduction of small, low-cost photoplethysmography devices embedded within wrist-worn consumer wearables, have made the collection of heart rate (HR) under free-living conditions more feasible. This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the validity of wrist-worn HR estimates to a criterion measure of HR (electrocardiography ECG or chest strap). Searches of PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, EBSCOhost, PsycINFO, and EMBASE resulted in a total of 44 articles representing 738 effect sizes across 15 different brands. Multi-level random effects meta-analyses resulted in a small mean difference (beats per min, bpm) of -0.40 bpm (95 confidence interval (CI) -1.64 to 0.83) during sleep, -0.01 bpm (-0.02 to 0.00) during rest, -0.51 bpm (-1.60 to 0.58) during treadmill activities (walking to running), while the mean difference was larger during resistance training (-7.26 bpm, -10.46 to -4.07) and cycling (-4.55 bpm, -7.24 to -1.87). Mean difference increased by 3 bpm (2.5 to 3.5) per 10 bpm increase of HR for resistance training. Wrist-worn devices that measure HR demonstrate acceptable validity compared to a criterion measure of HR for most common activities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02640414.2020.1767348

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Exercise-based heart rate monitoring was most affected by skin-tone bias, while resting heart rate accuracy was generally preserved.

    “When stratified by outcomes, exercise-based heart rate monitoring was most affected by skin-tone bias, while resting heart rate accuracy was generally preserved [12-14].”
  • In recent years, the quality and accuracy of wearables have improved.

    “In recent years, the quality and accuracy of wearables have improved [7,8], resulting in more clinically approved certifications [9].”
  • Numerous reviews and studies have investigated validation and accuracy of specific affordable wearables compared to gold standard measurements or in meta-analysis.

    “Numerous reviews and studies have investigated validation and accuracy, particularly for specific affordable wearables, comparing these to the gold standard measurements [21] or comparing evidence in a meta-analysis [8].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Weaver, R. G., Armstrong, B., Burkart, S., Zhang, S., & Beets, M. W.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • Nanjing Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Yanan
Venue
Journal of Sports Sciences
Published
2020-06-19
Volume
38
Issue
17
Pages
2021-2034
ISSN
  • 0264-0414 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-447X
OpenAlex
W3036553271
Cited by
88
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Sports Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
photoplethysmography, wrist-worn devices, heart rate measurement, device validity, consumer wearable devices, electrocardiogram, chest strap, sleep, resistance training, cycling, energy expenditure, accelerometry
MeSH terms
Wearable Electronic Devices, Activities of Daily Living, Bicycling, Energy Metabolism, Heart Rate, Humans, Rest, Running, Sleep, Wrist, Reproducibility of Results, Walking, Photoplethysmography, Resistance Training, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review