The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multivariate Vehicular Traffic Flow Prediction: Evaluation of ARIMAX Modeling
Abstract
Short-term freeway traffic flow forecasting efforts to date have focused on predictions based solely on previous observations at the location of interest. This univariate prediction is useful for certain types of intelligent transportation system (ITS) forecasts, such as operational demand forecasts at system entry points. In addition, data from upstream sensors should improve forecasts at downstream locations. This motivates investigation of multivariate forecast models that include upstream sensor data. A candidate model is transfer functions with autoregressive integrated moving average errors, otherwise known as the ARIMAX model. The ARIMAX model was applied to motorway data from France that had been the subject of previous traffic flow forecasting research. The results indicate that ARIMAX models provide improved forecast performance over univariate forecast models. However, several issues must be addressed before widespread use of ARIMAX models for ITS forecasts is feasible. These issues include the increased complexity of model specification, estimation, and maintenance; model consistency; model robustness in the face of interruptions in the upstream data series; and variability in the cross-correlation between upstream and downstream observations. The last issue is critical because ARIMAX models assume constant transfer function parameters, whereas the correlation between upstream and downstream observations vary with prevailing traffic conditions, especially traffic stream speed. Therefore, further research is needed to investigate model extensions and refinements to provide a generalizable, self-tuning multivariate forecasting model that is easily implemented and that effectively models varying upstream to downstream correlations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Traffic Flow Prediction With Big Data: A Deep Learning Approach
Lv, Y., Duan, Y., Kang, W., Li, Z., & Wang, F.-Y. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2014.2345663 · Cited by 3,000
DeepPF: A deep learning based architecture for metro passenger flow prediction
Liu, Y., Liu, Z., & Jia, R. (2019) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.027 · Cited by 426
Short-term traffic flow prediction with Conv-LSTM
Liu, Y., Zheng, H., Feng, X., & Chen, Z. (2017) · 2017 9th International Conference on Wireless Communications and Signal Processing (WCSP) · doi:10.1109/wcsp.2017.8171119 · Cited by 328
Survey on traffic prediction in smart cities
Nagy, A. M., & Simon, V. (2018) · Pervasive and Mobile Computing · doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2018.07.004 · Cited by 312
Miglani, A., & Kumar, N. (2019) · Vehicular Communications · doi:10.1016/j.vehcom.2019.100184 · Cited by 295
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, B. M.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-01
- Volume
- 1776
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 194-200
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2160507653
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multivariate Vehicular Traffic Flow Prediction: Evaluation of ARIMAX Modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3141/1776-25
- The paper
- Williams, B. M. (2001). Multivariate Vehicular Traffic Flow Prediction: Evaluation of ARIMAX Modeling. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.3141/1776-25
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.