The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Impacts of Holding Control Strategies on Transit Performance: Bus Simulation Model Analysis
Abstract
Transit operators are interested in strategies to improve service reliability as it is an important measure of performance and level of service. One of the common practices aimed at reducing service unreliability is holding control strategies. The design of these strategies involves the selection of a set of time point stops and the holding criteria for regulating the departure time. The interactions between passenger activity, transit operations, and traffic dynamics must be dynamically modeled to analyze the impacts of holding strategies on transit performance. An evaluation of different holding criteria and the number and location of time point stops was conducted with BusMezzo, a dynamic transit simulation model. The holding strategies were implemented in the model and applied to a high-frequency trunk bus line in Stockholm, Sweden. The analysis of the results considers the implications of holding strategies from both passenger and operator perspectives. The analysis suggests substantial gains are possible by implementing a holding strategy on the basis of the mean headway from the preceding and the succeeding buses. This strategy is the most efficient for passenger time savings as well as fleet costs and crew management.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Bus bunching is a common problem in public transport systems, characterized by a negative feedback loop between service headways, number of boarding passengers, and dwell times.
“A common problem in public transport systems is bus bunching, characterized by a negative feedback loop between service headways, number of boarding passengers and dwell times.”
From Mitigating bus bunching with real-time crowding information (2023) · cites this paper as Cats et al. 2011b
BusMezzo is applicable for investigating bus bunching phenomena and holding and control strategies.
“Consequently, it is also applicable for investigating the bus bunching phenomena (Moreira-Matias et al. 2016) and holding and control strategies (Cats et al. 2011b; Laskaris et al. 2019; Gkiotsalitis and Cats 2019).”
From Mitigating bus bunching with real-time crowding information (2023) · cites this paper as Cats et al. 2011b
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- Casey R. F., 2000, Advanced Public Transportation Systems—The State of the Art: Update 2000.
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1990)116:1(49) · DOI
- 10.3141/2188-02 · DOI
- Turnquist M. A., 1980, Transportation Research Record 746, 25
- Abkowitz M., 1984, Transportation Research Record 961, 1
- 10.1002/atr.5670350206 · DOI
- 10.1287/trsc.35.3.215.10150 · DOI
- 10.1287/trsc.35.1.1.10143 · DOI
- 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1990)116:4(517) · DOI
- 10.1016/0191-2607(86)90079-8 · DOI
- 10.3141/1666-04 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0965-8564(02)00010-1 · DOI
- 10.3141/1791-02 · DOI
- CatsO., BurghoutW., ToledoT., and KoutsopoulosH. N. Evaluation of Real-Time Holding Strategies for Improved Bus Service Reliability. Proc. 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Funchal, Madeira Island, Portugal, IEEE, Piscataway, N.J. 2010, pp. 718–723. · DOI
- Rossetti M. D., 1998, Transportation Research Part A, 32, 607
- 10.1016/j.trb.2009.04.002 · DOI
- 10.3141/2006-10 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.trc.2009.05.016 · DOI
- 1999, TCRP Synthesis 34: Data Analysis for Bus Planning and Monitoring.
- Burghout W., 2004, Hybrid Microscopic–Mesoscopic Traffic Simulation.
- Kittelson & Associates, Inc., KFH Group, Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglass, Inc., and K. Hunter-Zaworski, 2003, TCRP Report 100: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual
- 10.1016/j.trc.2010.02.008 · DOI
- 10.3141/2143-09 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tra.2009.07.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tranpol.2004.05.001 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Real-time holding control for high-frequency transit with dynamics
Sánchez-Martínez, G. E., Koutsopoulos, H. N., & Wilson, N. H. M. (2016) · Transportation Research Part B: Methodological · doi:10.1016/j.trb.2015.11.013 · Cited by 125
Self-citationMitigating bus bunching with real-time crowding information
Drabicki, A., Kucharski, R., & Cats, O. (2023) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-022-10270-3 · Cited by 30
Self-citationMitigating Bus Bunching with Reinforcement Learning Enhanced by Semantic Stop Embedding
Dong, X., & Gayah, V. V. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.10207
Metadata
- Authors
- Cats, O., Larijani, A. N., Koutsopoulos, H. N., & Burghout, W.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Cats, Oded
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2011-01
- Volume
- 2216
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 51-58
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2073040622
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 11.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
- Keywords
- service reliability, crew management, level of service
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review