Mitigating Bus Bunching with Reinforcement Learning Enhanced by Semantic Stop Embedding

It may state two separate claims as one.

Compared with the best calibrated Daganzo baseline, the semantic controller reduces headway variability, bunching events, and passenger waiting time by 32.0%, 69.2%, and 24.0%, respectively.

“Compared with the best calibrated Daganzo baseline, the semantic controller reduces headway variability, bunching events, and passenger waiting time by 32.0%, 69.2%, and 24.0%, respectively.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

Warm-start fine-tuning accelerates early-stage learning and improves transferred policies.

“while warm-start fine-tuning accelerates early-stage learning and improves transferred policies”

• Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · p. 5 · plain

  “The findings reveal that target-route adaptation substantially improves transferred policies and early-stage learning, highlighting the distinction between immediate generalization and adaptation-based reuse.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

Semantic stop information improves headway regularity, waiting time, and holding effort, providing a more favorable overall trade-off across control objectives.

“whereas semantic stop information improves headway regularity, waiting time, and holding effort, providing a more favorable overall trade-off across control objectives.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

The spacing-only policy produces marginally fewer bunching events at the cost of substantially longer holding.

“whereas the spacing-only policy produces marginally fewer bunching events at the cost of substantially longer holding.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

The semantic-enhanced RL policy substantially reduces holding at Westgate on WL and University Club on BL, while retaining or increasing holding at Lot 83 W on WL and Lot 83 E on BL.

“For example, the semanticenhanced RL policy substantially reduces holding at Westgate on WL and University Club on BL, while retaining or increasing holding at Lot 83 W on WL and Lot 83 E on BL.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

Adding semantic stop information changes where holding is applied: the unweighted stop-level average hold probability decreases from 0.612 to 0.508 on WL and from 0.582 to 0.561 on BL, while the locations with increased or reduced holding also shift.

“Adding semantic stop information further changes where holding is applied: the unweighted stoplevel average hold probability decreases from 0.612 to 0.508 on WL and from 0.582 to 0.561 on BL, while the locations with increased or reduced holding also shift.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

All three RL controllers achieve lower mean headway variation, fewer bunching events, and shorter passenger waiting times than both benchmark methods (the Daganzo rule and the no-control baseline).

“First, all three RL controllers achieve lower mean headway variation, fewer bunching events, and shorter passenger waiting times than both benchmark methods-the Daganzo rule and the nocontrol baseline.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

Compared with WL, BL has more stops, a longer route, and greater link travel-time variability, while WL has a slightly higher total arrival rate.

“compared with WL, BL has more stops, a longer route, and greater link travel-time variability, while WL has a slightly higher total arrival rate - differences that provide distinct operating conditions for same-route control and cross-route transfer evaluation.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

With active control, the number of bunching events decreases and the remaining events become more localized.

“With active control, the number of bunching events decreases and the remaining events become more localized”

It may state two separate claims as one.

Among the RL controllers, the semantic policy achieves the lowest mean headway variation, passenger waiting time, and holding time.

“Among the RL controllers, our semantic policy achieves the lowest mean headway variation, passenger waiting time, and holding time, whereas the spacing-only policy produces marginally fewer bunching events at the cost of substantially longer holding.”

• Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · p. 15 · plain

  “It achieves the lowest headway variation, passenger waiting time, and holding time among the RL controllers, while attaining the second-lowest bunching count.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

In the no-control cases, bunching events are widely distributed across both routes and often appear repeatedly over consecutive stops.

“In the no-control cases, bunching events are widely distributed across both routes and often appear repeatedly over consecutive stops”

It may state two separate claims as one.

Cold-start training achieves the lowest headway variation, bunching count, and passenger waiting time among the RL variants.

“Cold-start training achieves the lowest headway variation, bunching count, and passenger waiting time among the RL variants.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

Zero-shot transfer improves bunching count and passenger waiting time relative to the no-control baseline, but provides little improvement in headway variation.

“In contrast, zero-shot transfer improves bunching count and passenger waiting time relative to the no-control baseline, but provides little improvement in headway variation”

It may state two separate claims as one.

In the WL realization, the bunching count decreases from 57 under no control to 30 under the Daganzo rule, 22 under spacing-only RL, and 1 under spacing+semantic RL.

“In the WL realization, the bunching count decreases from 57 under no control to 30 under the Daganzo rule, 22 under spacing-only RL, and 1 under spacing+semantic RL.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

After target-route adaptation (warm-start with fine-tuning), the transferred policy further improves over zero-shot transfer and reaches a more balanced performance level.

“After target-route adaptation (warm-start with fine-tuning), the transferred policy further improves over zero-shot transfer and reaches a more balanced performance level.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

The warm-start policy begins from a better initial performance level, with higher total reward and headway reward, as well as lower headway variation and passenger waiting time during the early training episodes.

“The training curves show that the warm-start policy begins from a better initial performance level, with higher total reward and headway reward, as well as lower headway variation and passenger waiting time during the early training episodes.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

Existing reinforcement-learning-based holding controllers primarily rely on instantaneous operational variables or route-specific stop identifiers, which provide limited information about the functional and operational context of individual stops and constrain policy reuse across routes.

“Existing reinforcement-learning-based holding controllers primarily rely on instantaneous operational variables or route-specific stop identifiers, which provide limited information about the functional and operational context of individual stops and constrain policy reuse across routes.”

• Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · p. 4 · plain

  “Despite these advances, existing state representations largely rely on operational variables, such as headways, vehicle loads and passenger occupancy (Wood et al. 2023), passenger flows, previous actions, and categorical vehicle or stop identifiers.”

• Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · p. 4 · plain

  “These features describe the current fleet state, but categorical identifiers provide little information about the functional and land-use context of individual stops or the relationships between stops across routes.”

• cites Wood et al. 2023Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Xu et al. 2025Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

The semantic vector provides contextual information that cannot be inferred directly from instantaneous bus spacing, including the physical, functional, and operational characteristics of the current stop.

“The semantic vector provides contextual information that cannot be inferred directly from instantaneous bus spacing, including the physical, functional, and operational characteristics of the current stop.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: LLM-generated semantic annotations accurately capture the functional and operational characteristics of stops.

Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

Daganzo (2009) derived an adaptive headway-based rule designed to contain local disturbances without requiring substantial schedule slack.

“Daganzo (2009) derived an adaptive headway-based rule designed to contain local disturbances without requiring substantial schedule slack”

• cites Daganzo 2009Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

It may state two separate claims as one.

The analysis demonstrates the added value of semantic representations for selected control settings and clarifies their role beyond conventional spacing-based state designs.

“The analysis demonstrates the added value of semantic representations for selected control settings and clarifies their role beyond conventional spacing-based state designs.”

Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

The proposed approach represents stops' functional and operational characteristics in a shared feature space that can be used across routes.

“Rather than treating stops as arbitrary routespecific identifiers, the proposed approach represents their functional and operational characteristics in a shared feature space that can be used across routes.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: LLM-generated semantic annotations accurately capture the functional and operational characteristics of stops.

Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

Daganzo and Pilachowski (2011) showed that two-way spacing information and bus-to-bus cooperation can stabilize service.

“Daganzo and Pilachowski (2011) showed that two-way spacing information and bus-to-bus cooperation can stabilize service.”

• cites Daganzo and Pilachowski 2011Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

Recent reviews identify passenger-oriented objectives, coordinated control, simplified demand and network assumptions, and limited real-world evaluation as continuing research gaps.

“Recent reviews further identify passenger-oriented objectives, coordinated control, simplified demand and network assumptions, and limited real-world evaluation as continuing research gaps (Gkiotsalitis and Cats 2021; Rezazada et al. 2024).”

• cites Gkiotsalitis and Cats 2021Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

• cites Rezazada et al. 2024Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

It may state two separate claims as one.

Semantic state representations can complement conventional operational states and support adaptation-based policy reuse across related transit routes.

“These findings suggest that semantic state representations can complement conventional operational states and support adaptation-based policy reuse across related transit routes.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: The simulation calibrated with historical data from two routes is representative enough to generalize findings to related transit routes.

Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

A systematic benchmark found that discrete holding actions can perform comparably to continuous actions.

“while discrete holding actions can perform comparably to continuous actions (Xu et al. 2025).”

• cites Xu et al. 2025Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

It may state two separate claims as one.

A delayed bus encounters more passengers and experiences longer dwell times, while the following bus serves fewer passengers and gradually closes the gap.

“A delayed bus encounters more passengers and experiences longer dwell times, while the following bus serves fewer passengers and gradually closes the gap (Daganzo and Pilachowski 2011).”

• cites Daganzo and Pilachowski 2011Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

It may state two separate claims as one.

Schedule-based holding methods required relatively little holding but provided limited headway stabilization.

“An empirical comparison by Berrebi et al. (2018) found that schedule-based methods required relatively little holding but provided limited headway stabilization”

• cites Berrebi et al. 2018Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

It may state two separate claims as one.

These dynamics can amplify modest headway deviations into persistent bunching, resulting in longer and less predictable passenger waits, uneven vehicle loads, and increased in-vehicle delay.

“These dynamics can amplify modest headway deviations into persistent bunching, resulting in longer and less predictable passenger waits, uneven vehicle loads, and increased in-vehicle delay (Cats et al. 2011).”

• cites Cats et al. 2011Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.

The semantic representations are constructed in a shared feature space so that stops from different routes can be compared using the same coordinate system.

“The semantic representations are constructed in a shared feature space so that stops from different routes can be compared using the same coordinate system.”

• AssumptionRests on an assumption: LLM-generated semantic annotations accurately capture the functional and operational characteristics of stops.

Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

The effectiveness of bus holding strategies depends on the holding criterion and control-point configuration.

“Subsequent studies demonstrated that the effectiveness of such strategies depends on the holding criterion and control-point configuration (Cats et al. 2011).”

• cites Cats et al. 2011Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

Prediction-based holding methods achieved a better regularity-holding tradeoff but were sensitive to prediction accuracy.

“whereas prediction-based methods achieved a better regularity-holding tradeoff but were sensitive to prediction accuracy.”

• cites Berrebi et al. 2018Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

Probably not a substantial claim.

Stochastic passenger demand and link travel times are generated from route-specific parameters estimated from historical data.

“Stochastic passenger demand and link travel times are generated from route-specific parameters estimated from the historical data described in Section 4.2.”

Probably not a substantial claim.

A systematic benchmark found that forward and backward spacing alone can outperform a richer state containing a stop identifier.

“In particular, a systematic benchmark found that forward and backward spacing alone can outperform a richer state containing a stop identifier”

• cites Xu et al. 2025Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

It may state two separate claims as one.

Semantic stop representations can complement conventional bus holding states and support source-to-target policy reuse and adaptation in the studied setting.

“Overall, the findings indicate that semantic stop representations can complement conventional bus holding states and support source-to-target policy reuse and adaptation in the studied setting.”

Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

Final evaluation uses independent seeds and deterministic greedy actions.

“Final evaluation uses independent seeds and deterministic greedy actions.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

Direct policy reuse is feasible but insufficient without target-route adaptation.

“indicating that direct policy reuse is feasible but insufficient without targetroute adaptation.”

• Also stated in: § CONCLUSION · p. 15 · plain

  “In the cross-route experiment, zero-shot deployment of the source-route policy provides partial benefits but does not fully adapt to the target route.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

The policy learned on the source route contains transferable information that can be reused on the target route, thereby reducing the amount of target-route training needed to obtain a reasonable control policy.

“These trajectories suggest that the policy learned on the source route contains transferable information that can be reused on the target route, thereby reducing the amount of target-route training needed to obtain a reasonable control policy.”

Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.

Prior evidence indicates that arbitrary stop identifiers provide limited additional information beyond compact spacing-based states.

“This finding is consistent with prior evidence that arbitrary stop identifiers provide limited additional information beyond compact spacing-based states (Xu et al. 2025).”

• cites Xu et al. 2025Not matched

  Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

It may state two separate claims as one.

Source-route knowledge can reduce target-route training effort and support effective cross-route policy adaptation.

“Together with the faster early-stage learning shown in Figure 2, these results indicate that source-route knowledge can reduce target-route training effort and support effective cross-route policy adaptation.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

Semantic stop information affects the spatial allocation of control effort and may help the policy identify more suitable locations for regulating downstream service.

“These changes suggest that semantic stop information affects the spatial allocation of control effort and may help the policy identify more suitable locations for regulating downstream service.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

Warm-start fine-tuning can adapt the source-route policy to the target route while maintaining a lower control effort.

“suggesting that warm-start finetuning can adapt the source-route policy to the target route while maintaining a lower control effort.”

It may state two separate claims as one.

Holding actions can interrupt the propagation of bunching and improve route-level resilience.

“indicating that holding actions can interrupt the propagation of bunching and improve route-level resilience.”

Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.

Each RL controller is trained for 200 episodes, validated every 10 episodes, and selected by the checkpoint with the lowest mean validation headway variation (ties broken by total bunching count).

“each RL controller is trained for 200 episodes, validated every 10 episodes, and selected by the checkpoint with the lowest mean validation headway variation (ties broken by total bunching count).”

Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.

The representations are constructed and cached offline, so language-model inference, text embedding, and representation alignment do not add computation or latency to the real-time control loop.

“From an implementation perspective, the representations are constructed and cached offline, so language-model inference, text embedding, and representation alignment do not add computation or latency to the real-time control loop.”