The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Management of a Shared Autonomous Electric Vehicle Fleet: Implications of Pricing Schemes
Abstract
The market potential of a fleet of shared autonomous electric vehicles (SAEVs) is explored by using a multinomial logit mode choice model in an agent-based framework and different fare settings. The mode share of SAEVs in the simulated midsize city (modeled roughly after Austin, Texas) is predicted to lie between 14% and 39% when the SAEVs compete with privately owned, manually driven vehicles and city bus service. The underlying assumptions are that SAEVs are priced between $0.75/mi and $1.00/mi, which delivers significant net revenues to the fleet owner–operator under all modeled scenarios; that they have an 80-mi range and that Level 2 charging infrastructure is available; and that automation costs are up to $25,000 per vehicle. Various dynamic pricing schemes for SAEV fares indicate that specific fleet metrics can be improved with targeted strategies. For example, pricing strategies that attempt to balance available SAEV supply with anticipated trip demand can decrease average wait times by 19% to 23%. However, trade-offs exist within this price setting: fare structures that favor higher revenue-to-cost ratios—by targeting travelers with a high value of travel time (VOTT)—reduce SAEV mode shares, while those that favor larger mode shares—by appealing to a wider VOTT range—produce lower payback.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Using an Activity-Based Model to Explore the Potential Impacts of Automated Vehicles
Childress, S., Nichols, B., Charlton, B., & Coe, S. (2015) · Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board · doi:10.3141/2493-11 · Cited by 319
Cited by
Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review
Narayanan, S., Chaniotakis, E., & Antoniou, C. (2020) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2019.12.008 · Cited by 691
Chen, T. D., Kockelman, K. M., & Hanna, J. P. (2016) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2016.08.020 · Cited by 529
Self-citationSoteropoulos, A., Berger, M., & Ciari, F. (2019) · Transport Reviews · doi:10.1080/01441647.2018.1523253 · Cited by 414
Taiebat, M., Brown, A. L., Safford, H. R., Qu, S., & Xu, M. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.8b00127 · Cited by 334
Shen, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhao, J. (2018) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2018.04.004 · Cited by 330
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, T. D., & Kockelman, K. M.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-01
- Volume
- 2572
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 37-46
- ISSN
- 0361-1981 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-4052
- OpenAlex
- W2554127530
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Management of a Shared Autonomous Electric Vehicle Fleet: Implications of Pricing Schemes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3141/2572-05
- The paper
- Chen, T. D., & Kockelman, K. M. (2016). Management of a Shared Autonomous Electric Vehicle Fleet: Implications of Pricing Schemes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. https://doi.org/10.3141/2572-05
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.