Cited by 3Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGeriatric Care and Nursing HomesFood composition and properties

Is Fibre an Effective Strategy to Improve Laxation in Long-Term Care Residents?

Dahl, Wendy J., Mendoza, Daniela Rivero·2018·Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Abstract

The high prevalence of constipation in long-term care (LTC) residents has been a long-standing issue for caregivers, attending health professionals, and the residents themselves. The traditional medical response has been to utilize pharmaceutical laxatives, enemas, and suppositories for treatment. The purpose of this review was to determine if fibre supplementation (including fibre added to foods) is effective in increasing stool frequency, improving stool consistency, and decreasing laxative use in LTC residents. A systematic search was conducted using PubMed and CINAHL databases, inclusive to March 2017. Search terms included: "long-term care" or "nursing home" AND "fiber (fibre)," "bran," "psyllium," "inulin," or "prebiotic." Intervention trials of fibre supplementation with ≥5 LTC residents were included. The search generated 456 articles following removal of duplicates; 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. Three additional trials were identified through a hand search of references of pertinent articles. Current evidence suggests that added fibre may be effective in increasing stool frequency and/or decreasing laxative use in LTC residents and, thus, may lessen the burden of constipation. However, randomized controlled trials are needed to clearly demonstrate the effects of adding fibre to foods, particularly insoluble and less fermentable sources, on constipation in LTC residents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3148/cjdpr-2017-028

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dahl, W. J., & Mendoza, D. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Florida (US)
  • Food Science and Human Nutrition Department, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
Venue
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Published
2018-03
Volume
79
Issue
1
Pages
35-41
ISSN
  • 1486-3847 (ISSN-L)
  • 2292-9592
OpenAlex
W2760970288
Cited by
3
References
4
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 2
FWCI
0.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
constipation, fibre supplementation, long-term care residents, nursing home residents, laxative use, stool frequency, stool consistency, psyllium, inulin, prebiotics, bran, dietary fiber
MeSH terms
Canada, Constipation, Dietary Fiber, Humans, Long-Term Care, Nutritional Status, Quality of Life, Dietary Supplements, Laxatives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review