Cited by 94Clinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyGastrointestinal motility and disordersFood composition and properties

Bowel Function of Long‐Term Tube‐Fed Patients Consuming Formulae with and without Dietary Fiber

Shankardass, K., Chuchmach, S., Chelswick, K., Stefanovich, C., Spurr, S., Brooks, J., Tsai, M., Saibil, F.G. +2 more·1990·Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition

Abstract

Diarrhea, constipation and subsequent laxative use are chronic problems in long-term enterally fed patients. We have conducted a double-blind randomized crossover study to evaluate the effects of two enteral formulae (Enrich, 12.8 g of dietary fiber per 1000 kcal and Ensure, fiber-free) on stool frequency, fecal weight, laxative use, gastrointestinal tolerance and bowel function in chronic care tube-fed patients. Twenty-eight subjects (24 male, 4 female) completed the study. Mean daily number of stools and mean daily fecal wet weight in Enrich-fed patients were not significantly different from those of patients receiving Ensure. Ensure-fed patients required significantly more laxatives (p = 0.02) than those receiving Enrich. There were 26 reports of diarrhea in the Ensure-fed group as compared to 6 in the Enrich-fed group, and this difference was significant (p = 0.006). Reporting rates for constipation were not significantly different in the two groups. At the end of the study, the bowel function of 57.1% of patients receiving Enrich was improved when compared with that of 14.3% of Ensure-fed patients, and this difference was significant (p = 0.005). These results suggest that the addition of dietary fiber to enteral formulae improves gastrointestinal tolerance and bowel function, and reduces laxative use in long-term enterally fed patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0148607190014005508

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fiber-containing products for enteral nutrition have been shown to contribute to normal bowel function.

    “Conversely, fiber-containing products for EN have been shown to contribute to normal bowel function (24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30) and are, thus, generally recommended.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shankardass, K., Chuchmach, S., Chelswick, K., Stefanovich, C., Spurr, S., Brooks, J., Tsai, M., Saibil, F. G., Cohen, L. B., & Edington, J. D.
Affiliations
  • Chedoke Hospital (CA)
  • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA)
  • Abbott (Canada) (CA)
Venue
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1990-09
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
508-512
ISSN
  • 0148-6071 (ISSN-L)
  • 1941-2444
OpenAlex
W2127322655
Cited by
94
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
Keywords
dietary fiber, enteral formulas, long-term tube feeding, bowel function, diarrhea, constipation, laxative use, stool frequency, fecal weight, gastrointestinal tolerance
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Defecation, Dietary Fiber, Enteral Nutrition, Female, Food, Formulated, Humans, Intestine, Large, Male, Middle Aged, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review