Cited by 23Food Security and Health in Diverse PopulationsFood Security and Socioeconomic DynamicsNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Determining Student Food Insecurity at Memorial University of Newfoundland

Blundell, Lisa, Mathews, Maria, Bowley, Claire, Roebothan, Barbara·2019·Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Abstract

Purpose Our study compared the prevalence of food insecurity among 3 student groups attending Memorial University of Newfoundland (MUN): International (INT), Canadian out-of-province (OOP), and Newfoundland and Labrador (NL). Factors associated with food insecurity were also investigated. Methods Data were collected via an online survey distributed to an estimated 10 400 returning MUN students registered at a campus in St. John's, NL. Respondents were recruited through e-mails, posters, and social media. Ten questions from the Canadian Household Food Security Survey Module adult scale were asked to assess food security. Logistic regression was used to compare rates of food insecurity between the three population subgroups. Results Of the 971 eligible student respondents, 39.9% were food insecure (moderate or severe). After controlling for program type, parental status, living arrangement, and primary income source, OOP and INT students were 1.63 (95% CI = 1.11-2.40) and 3.04 (95% CI = 1.89-4.88) times more likely, respectively, to be food insecure than NL students. Conclusions Approximately 40% of participating MUN students experienced food insecurity, a higher proportion than reported for the overall provincial population. Groups at high risk of food insecurity include INT students, students with children, and those relying on government funding as their primary income.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3148/cjdpr-2018-026

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Blundell, L., Mathews, M., Bowley, C., & Roebothan, B.
Affiliations
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Published
2019-03-01
Volume
80
Issue
1
Pages
14-21
ISSN
  • 1486-3847 (ISSN-L)
  • 2292-9592
OpenAlex
W2894758780
Cited by
23
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
3.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Memorial University of Newfoundland
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Security and Socioeconomic Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
student food insecurity, university students, international students, parental status, Memorial University of Newfoundland
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Canada, Female, Food Supply, Humans, Income, Male, Newfoundland and Labrador, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Students, Universities, Logistic Models, Marital Status, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review