Cited by 64Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorObesity, Physical Activity, DietSchool Health and Nursing Education

The Impact of Canadian School Food Programs on Children’s Nutrition and Health: A Systematic Review

Colley, Paige, Myer, Bronia, Seabrook, Jamie, Gilliland, Jason·2019·Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research

Abstract

The quality of children’s diets has declined over the past few decades, giving rise to a variety of health-related consequences. In response to this trend, school food programs have become an increasingly effective method to support nutrition and lifelong healthy eating habits. This systematic review synthesizes current academic literature pertaining to school nutrition programs in Canada to identify existing interventions and their impacts on children’s nutritional knowledge, dietary behaviour, and food intake. The review was conducted through a search of the following databases: ERIC, Education Source, CINAHL, PubMed, SagePub, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and CBCA. Information extracted from the articles included the program objectives, intervention design and components, research evaluation, and primary outcomes. A total of 11 articles evaluating Canadian school nutrition programs were identified. The programs incorporated a variety of intervention components including policy, education, family and community involvement, and/or food provision. These multi-component interventions were positively associated with children’s development of nutrition knowledge, dietary behaviour changes, and intake of healthy foods; however, barriers associated with intervention duration, intensity, and availability of resources may have influenced the extent to which these programs impacted children’s diets and overall health.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3148/cjdpr-2018-037

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Colley, P., Myer, B., Seabrook, J., & Gilliland, J.
Affiliations
Western University (CA)
Venue
Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research
Published
2019-06-01
Volume
80
Issue
2
Pages
79-86
ISSN
  • 1486-3847 (ISSN-L)
  • 2292-9592
OpenAlex
W2900827823
Cited by
64
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Canadian Journal of Dietetic Practice and Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Scholarship@Western (Western University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
Keywords
school food programs, school nutrition programs, child nutrition, child health, nutrition knowledge, dietary behaviour, dietary intake, healthy eating habits, multicomponent intervention, family and community involvement, nutrition education, food provisioning
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Canada, Child, Child Nutritional Physiological Phenomena, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Food Services, Health Education, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Nutritional Status, School Health Services, Schools

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review