The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Researchers' roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal
Open accessAbstract
Co-production of knowledge between academic and non-academic communities is a prerequisite for research aiming at more sustainable development paths. Sustainability researchers face three challenges in such co-production: (a) addressing power relations; (b) interrelating different perspectives on the issues at stake; and (c) promoting a previously negotiated orientation towards sustainable development. A systematic comparison of four sustainability research projects in Kenya (vulnerability to drought), Switzerland (soil protection), Bolivia and Nepal (conservation vs. development) shows how the researchers intuitively adopted three different roles to face these challenges: the roles of reflective scientist, intermediary, and facilitator of a joint learning process. From this systematized and iterative self-reflection on the roles that a researcher can assume in the indeterminate social space where knowledge is co-produced, we draw conclusions regarding training.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Although very challenging, co-production of knowledge between academic and non-academic communities is an essential prerequisite for research aiming at more sustainable development (Pohl etal. 2010).”
From Designing agroecological systems across scales: a new analytical framework (2022) · cites this paper as Pohl et al. 2010
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques.
Ellis, C., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1992) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2074814 · Cited by 29,296
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 50th Anniversary Edition
Kuhn, T. S., & Hacking, I. (2012) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226458144.001.0001 · Cited by 21,170
Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques
Long, D. R., Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. M. (1993) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328955 · Cited by 17,625
Brundtland, G. H. (1991) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-7506-1049-0.50009-5 · Cited by 12,221
Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/030631289019003001 · Cited by 10,847
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions.
Böhm, D., & Kühn, T. (1964) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2217783 · Cited by 9,193
The New production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies
Gibbons, M. (1995) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.32-4463 · Cited by 7,049
(1990) · Cited by 5,210
The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.
Baber, Z., Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. A. (1995) · Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews · doi:10.2307/2076669 · Cited by 4,408
Knowledge systems for sustainable development
Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., Jäger, J., & Mitchell, R. B. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1231332100 · Cited by 3,660
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Boillat, S 2007. Traditional ecological knowledge, land use and ecosystem diversity in the Tunari National Park (Bolivia). An ethnoecological approach for dialogue between traditional and scientific ecological knowledge. PhD thesis. Centre for Development and Environment, Institute of Geography of the University of Bern; Faculty of Sciences. Bern: University of Bern.
- Ifejika Speranza, C 2006. Drought Vulnerability and Risk in Agro- Pastoral Areas: an Integrative Approach and its Application in Kenya. PhD Thesis. Centre for Development and Environ- ment, Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Switzerland.
- Jahn, T, F Keil and E Schramm 2006. Transdisziplinäre Integra- tion. In Soziale Ökologie -Grundzüge einer Wissenschaft von den gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnissen, eds E Becker and T Jahn, pp. 287-339. Frankfurt/New York: Campus.
- Pohl, C, L van Kerkhoff, G Bammer and G Hirsch Hadorn 2008. Integration. In Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, eds G Hirsch Hadorn, H Hoffmann-Riem, S Biber-Klemm et al., pp. 411-424. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Principles for knowledge co-production in sustainability research
Norström, A. V., Cvitanovic, C., Löf, M. F., West, S., Wyborn, C. A., Balvanera, P., BEDNAREK, A. T., Bennett, E. M., Biggs, R., de Bremond, A., et al. (2020) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0448-2 · Cited by 1,882
Self-citationTengö, M., Brondizio, E. S., Elmqvist, T., Malmer, P., & Spierenburg, M. (2014) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0501-3 · Cited by 1,329
“Lastly, co-production of knowledge entails engaging in mutual processes of knowledge generation at all stages of knowledge generation, such as for example an assessment, including validation (Berkes 2008; Pohl et al. 2010; Rist et al. 2011; Shirk et al. 2012).”
BackgroundCo-management and the co-production of knowledge: Learning to adapt in Canada's Arctic
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Dale, A. T., Kocho-Schellenberg, E., & Patton, E. (2011) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006 · Cited by 821
Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions
Wittmayer, J. M., & Schäpke, N. A. (2014) · Sustainability Science · doi:10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4 · Cited by 550
Clark, W. C., Tomich, T. P., van Noordwijk, M., Guston, D., Catacutan, D., Dickson, N. M., & McNie, E. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0900231108 · Cited by 568
Metadata
- Authors
- Pohl, C., Rist, S., Zimmermann, A., Fry, P., Gurung, G. S., Schneider, F., Speranza, C. I., Kiteme, B., Boillat, S., Serrano, E., Hadorn, G. H., & Wiesmann, U.
- Affiliations
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- University of Bern (CH)
- WWF Nepal (NP)
- German Institute of Development and Sustainability (DE)
- Centre for Training and Integrated Research In ASAL Development (KE)
- Corresponding author
- Pohl, Christian
- Rist, Stephan
- Zimmermann, Anne
- Fry, Patricia
- Gurung, Ghana S
- Schneider, Flurina
- Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika
- Kiteme, Boniface
- Serrano, Elvira
- Hadorn, Gertrude Hirsch
- Wiesmann, Urs
- ORCID
- Venue
- Science and Public Policy
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-05-01
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 267-281
- ISSN
- 0302-3427 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-5430
- OpenAlex
- W2058744145
- Cited by
- 555
- References
- 66
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 59 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 17
- FWCI
- 35.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Science and Public Policy (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
- Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration
- Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Social Science and Policy Research
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Research, Science, and Academia
- Keywords
- knowledge co-production, researcher role, sustainability research, power relations, intermediary role, facilitator role, joint learning, drought vulnerability, soil conservation, conservation versus development, research training, sustainable development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
