Cited by 8Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyWomen's cancer prevention and management

Experience of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Project in a Community Set Up-An Indian Study

Open access
Mandal, Ranajit, Banerjee, Dipanwita, Gupta, Krishnendu, Chatterjee, Puja, Vernekar, Manisha, Ray, Chandrima·2021·Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Initial introduction of HPV vaccination from 2006 to 2008 was largely confined to high-income countries (HIC), such as Australia, the United States, and Europe, where cervical cancer incidence is lowest. Much of the post-introduction literature has come from HICs, with a focus on coverage levels achieved, provider acceptability and early impact of vaccination on disease endpoints. However, there are a few literature evaluating the mechanics of delivery, feasibility of the health system and acceptability from low and middle income countries (LMICs). The primary objective was to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and safety of two dose HPV vaccination in adolescent girls between 9-14 years. METHODS: After an orientation camp followed by filling up of prevaccine questionnaires by parents on HPV related diseases and its vaccines and informed consent, girls between9-14years were vaccinated. They were asked to report any side effects in the next 24 hours after each dose. Parents were contacted on Day 7 and Day 30 to enquire about any side effects . Total 3 visits were required i.e two for the vaccination and one visit at 7th month post completion of second dose. To estimate the acceptability, successful completion of two doses by at least 80% of the girls were measured. For measurement of acceptability, either of the parents were recalled along with their daughter at 7th month and were asked to fill up a pre-set questionnaire. RESULTS: After institutional ethical clearance, 555 girls were recruited in the study from rural parts of West Bengal, India between July, 2017 to November, 2017. Out of which, 544 girls (98%) received their 2nd dose between January, 2018 and May, 2018 without any serious adverse effects. No serious adverse effect was reported on follow up till December, 2019. CONCLUSION: The introduction of HPV vaccination is feasible in large scale and the vaccine is well accepted and safe. .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31557/apjcp.2021.22.3.699

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Including local stakeholders in devising HPV vaccination interventions will be critical for program success in Indian communities.

    “Including local stakeholders in devising HPV vaccination interventions will be critical for program success in Indian communities [71].”

    From Acceptability of HPV vaccination for cervical cancer prevention amongst emerging adult women in rural Mysore, India: a mixed-methods study (2024) · cites this paper as [71]

    The Materials and Methods section (page unavailable) says the team consulted local stakeholders before developing its questionnaire and that local organizers played a key role in encouraging the community. The Discussion (page unavailable) says established local networks made recruitment easier. These observations support involving stakeholders, but the paper does not establish that including them in devising vaccination interventions is critical for program success across Indian communities. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent developments include the introduction of low-cost vaccines like Cervavac.

    “At the policy level, high vaccine costs, lack of integration into national immunisation programmes, and limited public funding restricted access, although there were recent developments such as the introduction of low-cost vaccines like Cervavac11,17,21.”

    From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion (page not supplied) anticipates an affordable Indian HPV vaccine, but says it was still undergoing a Phase III clinical trial. It does not name Cervavac or report the introduction of a low-cost vaccine, so it supports the affordability prospect but not the claimed development. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • At the policy level, high vaccine costs, lack of integration into national immunisation programmes, and limited public funding restricted access.

    “At the policy level, high vaccine costs, lack of integration into national immunisation programmes, and limited public funding restricted access, although there were recent developments such as the introduction of low-cost vaccines like Cervavac11,17,21.”

    From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [11]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says vaccine cost raises affordability concerns in India and recommends inclusion in the national immunisation programme, noting that states could fund distribution until then. It does not establish that limited public funding itself restricted access. Its discussion of national integration is also specific to India, not national programmes generally. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Education-led interventions increase intent to vaccinate, but hesitancy remains.

    “Although awareness using education-led interventions showed promise in increasing intent to vaccinate, there existed a hesitancy13,32,33.”

    From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Discussion reports increased vaccine acceptance after parents received educational factsheets and concludes that awareness and education can help community implementation. The Methods note that five girls refused a second dose, but the paper did not measure how many parents initially refused and did not establish that hesitancy persisted after education. It also did not measure a change in intent to vaccinate in its own project. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. A Nahvijou M Hadji AB Marnani A systematic review of economic aspects of cervical cancer screening strategies worldwide: discrepancy between economic analysis and policymaking Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2014 15 8229 37 2014 25339011
  2. André L P Abreu Raquel P Souza Fabrícia G Marcia EL C. A review of methods for detect human Papillomavirus infection Virol J 2012 9 262 23131123 PMC3507852
  3. Basu P Bhatla N Ngoma T Sankaranarayanan R Less than 3 doses of the HPV vaccine – Review of efficacy against virological and disease end points Hum Vac Immun 2016 12 1394 1402 PMC4964672 26933961
  4. Basu P Mittal S Acceptability of human papillomavirus vaccine among the urban, affluent and educated parents of young girls residing in Kolkata, Eastern India J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2011 37 393 401 21314807
  5. Basu P Muwonge R Bhatla N Two-dose recommendation for Human Papillomavirus vaccine can be extended up to 18 years – updated evidence from Indian follow-up cohort study Papillomavirus Res 2019 7 75 81 30711698 PMC6378832
  6. Basu P Banerjee D Singh P Bhattacharya C Biswas JB Efficacy and safety of human papillomavirus vaccine for primary prevention of cervical cancer: A review of evidence from phase III trials and national programs South Asian J Cancer 2013 2 187 92 24455618 PMC3889021
  7. Bhatla N Nene B Joshi S Are two doses of human papillomavirus vaccine sufficient for girls aged 15–18 years? Results from a cohort study in India Papillomavirus Res 2018 5 163 71 29578097 PMC6047463
  8. Bhatla N Singhal S Saraiya U Screening and management of preinvasive lesions of the cervix good clinical practice recommendations from the Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecologic Societies of India (FOGSI) JOGR 2019 46 201 14, 10 31814222
  9. Gallagher K Howard N Kabakama S Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine coverage achievements in low and middle-income countries 2007–2016 Papillomavirus Res 2017 4 72 8 29179873 PMC5710977
  10. Kaarthigeyan K Cervical cancer in India and HPV vaccination Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2012 33 7 12 22754202 PMC3385284
  11. Ladner J Besson M Audureau E Rodrigues M Saba J Experiences and lessons learned from 29 HPV vaccination programs implemented in 19 low and middle-income countries, 2009-2014 BMC Health Serv Res 2016 16 575 PMC5062879 27737666
  12. Levin A Wang S Levin C Tsu V Hutubessy R Costs of introducing and delivering HPV vaccines in low and lower middle income countries: Inputs for GAVI Policy on Introduction Grant Support to Countries PLoS One 2014 9 e101114 24968002 PMC4072768
  13. Luciani S Silvana B Laia A Irene R-M Cuauhtémoc D HPV vaccine implementation and monitoring in Latin America Implementación y monitoreo de la vacuna contra el VPH en América Latina Salud Publica Mex 2018 60 683 92 30699273
  14. Mehrotra R Hariprasad R Rajaraman P Stemming the wave of cervical cancer: Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Introduction in India J Glob Oncol 2018 4 1 4 PMC6180758 30241163
  15. Paul P Tanner AE Gravitt PE Acceptability of HPV vaccine implementation among parents in India Health Care Women Int 2014 35 1148 61 23611111 PMC4503242
  16. Sankaranarayanan R Bhatla N Basu P Current global status & impact of human papillomavirus vaccination: Implications for India Indian J Med Res 2016 144 169 80 27934795 PMC5206867
  17. Sankaranarayanan R Joshi S Muwonge R 2018) Can a single dose of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine prevent cervical cancer? Early findings from an Indian study Vaccine 36 4783 91 29551226
  18. Zhai L Tumban E Gardasil-9: A global survey of projected efficacy Antiviral Res 2016 130 101 9 27040313

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mandal, R., Banerjee, D., Gupta, K., Chatterjee, P., Vernekar, M., & Ray, C.
Affiliations
  • Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute (IN)
  • Vivekananda Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
  • Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Corresponding author
Banerjee, Dipanwita
Venue
Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention
Published
2021-03-01
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
699-704
ISSN
  • 1513-7368 (ISSN-L)
  • 2476-762X
OpenAlex
W3143426740
Cited by
8
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Chittaranjan National Cancer Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Women's cancer prevention and management
Keywords
HPV vaccination, HPV vaccine, adolescent girls, vaccine safety, vaccine acceptance, cervical cancer prevention, rural West Bengal, low- and middle-income countries
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Child, Delivery of Health Care, Developing Countries, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, India, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Immunization Programs, Papillomavirus Infections, Papillomavirus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review