Cited by 68Cervical Cancer and HPV ResearchHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeGenital Health and Disease

Cost-effectiveness of human papillomavirus vaccination for adolescent girls in Punjab state: Implications for India’s universal immunization program

Open access
Prinja, Shankar, Bahuguna, Pankaj, Faujdar, Dharmjeet Singh, Jyani, Gaurav, Srinivasan, Radhika, Ghoshal, Sushmita, Suri, Vanita, Singh, Mini P. +1 more·2017·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination for adolescent girls is being considered in the Punjab state of India. However, evidence regarding cost‐effectiveness is sought by policy makers when making this decision. The current study was undertaken to evaluate the incremental cost per quality‐adjusted life‐years (QALYs) gained with introduction of the HPV vaccine compared with a no‐vaccination scenario. METHODS: A static progression model, using a combination of decision tree and Markov models, was populated using epidemiological, cost, coverage, and effectiveness data to determine the cost‐effectiveness of HPV vaccination. Using a societal perspective, lifetime costs and consequences (in terms of QALYs) among a cohort of 11‐year‐old adolescent girls in Punjab state were modeled in 2 alternate scenarios with and without vaccination. All costs and consequences were discounted at a rate of 3%. RESULTS: Although immunizing 1 year's cohort of 11‐year‐old girls in Punjab state costs Indian National Rupees (INR) 135 million (US dollars [USD] 2.08 million and International dollars [Int$] 6.25 million) on an absolute basis, its net cost after accounting for treatment savings is INR 38 million (USD 0.58 million and Int$ 1.76 million). Incremental cost per QALY gained for HPV vaccination was found to be INR 73 (USD 1.12 and Int$ 3.38). Given all the data uncertainties, there is a 90% probability for the vaccination strategy to be cost‐effective in Punjab state at a willingness‐to‐pay threshold of INR 10,000, which is less than one‐tenth of the per capita gross domestic product. CONCLUSIONS: HPV vaccination appears to be a very cost‐effective strategy for Punjab state, and is likely to be cost‐effective for other Indian states. Cancer 2017;123:3253‐60. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.30734

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our finding regarding the cost effectiveness of HPV vaccination is in line with a previous analysis done for Punjab state in India.

    “Finally, our finding regarding the cost effectiveness of HPV vaccination are in line with a previous analysis done for Punjab state in India. [35]”
  • At the individual level, limited knowledge, cultural misconceptions, and attitudinal barriers such as fear of side effects or concerns about morality were key problems, especially among less educated or rural populations.

    “At the individual level, limited knowledge, cultural misconceptions, and attitudinal barriers, such as fear of side effects or concerns about morality were key problems, especially among less educated or rural populations12,14,17,19,28,37,38.”

    From Barriers to HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in India: A scoping review (2026) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Introduction discusses evidence needed for HPV-vaccine policy decisions, and the Limitations discuss what the cost-effectiveness model did not include. Neither addresses individual-level barriers such as limited knowledge, misconceptions, fear of side effects, or morality concerns, including among less educated or rural populations. Searches for those barriers and for “side effects” found no supporting passage in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Jhansivani Y, Rani S. Epidemiology of gynecological cancers in a ter- tiary care center Government General Hospital, Guntur. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2015;14:41-45.
  2. Cavaljuga S, Cubro H, Izetbegovic S. Human papillomavirus vacci- nation-a systematic review of cost-effectiveness analyses. S East Eur Health Sci J. 2013;3:159-168.
  3. Fox-Rushby J, Cairns J. Economic Evaluation. New York: Open University Press; 2005.
  4. Disaia P, Creasman WE. Invasive Cervical Cancer in Clinical Gyne- cologic Oncology. 4th ed. St. Louis: Mosby Year Book; 1993.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prinja, S., Bahuguna, P., Faujdar, D. S., Jyani, G., Srinivasan, R., Ghoshal, S., Suri, V., Singh, M. P., & Kumar, R.
Affiliations
  • Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (IN)
  • School of Public Health Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research Chandigarh India
Corresponding author
Prinja, Shankar
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2017-05-04
Volume
123
Issue
17
Pages
3253-3260
ISSN
  • 0008-543X (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0142
OpenAlex
W2610835229
Cited by
68
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5
FWCI
6.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cancer (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
Keywords
HPV vaccination, cost-effectiveness, adolescent girls, cervical cancer prevention, Universal Immunization Programme, willingness-to-pay threshold
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Humans, India, Markov Chains, Retrospective Studies, Cohort Studies, Immunization Programs, Universal Health Insurance, Papillomavirus Infections, Mass Vaccination, Papillomavirus Vaccines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review