The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: an integrative review: EBP barriers and facilitators from a CQI perspective
Open accessAbstract
AIMS: The purpose of the present study is to examine the barriers and facilitators to evidence-based practice (EBP) using Shortell's framework for continuous quality improvement (CQI). BACKGROUND: EBP is typically undertaken to improve practice. Although there have been many studies focused on the barriers and facilitators to adopting EBP, these have not been tied explicitly to CQI frameworks. METHODS: CINAHL, Academic Search Premier, Medline, Psych Info, ABI/Inform and LISTA databases were searched using the keywords: nurses, information literacy, access to information, sources of knowledge, decision making, research utilization, information seeking behaviour and nursing practice, evidence-based practice. Shortell's framework was used to organize the barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: Across the articles, the most common barriers were lack of time and lack of autonomy to change practice which falls within the strategic and cultural dimensions in Shortell's framework. CONCLUSIONS: Barriers and facilitators to EBP adoption occur at the individual and institutional levels. Solutions to the barriers need to be directed to the dimension where the barrier occurs, while recognizing that multidimensional approaches are essential to the success of overcoming these barriers. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The findings of the present study can help nurses identify barriers and implement strategies to promote EBP as part of CQI.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (2002) · Journal For Healthcare Quality · doi:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2002.tb00463.x · Cited by 8,483
Evidence-Based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM
Wilson, M. C. (2001) · ACP Journal Club · doi:10.7326/acpjc-2001-134-1-a15 · Cited by 1,661
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout‐Overholt, E. (2004) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,134
Shortell, S. M., Bennett, C. L., & Byck, G. R. (1998) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00107 · Cited by 639
Lasser, K. E., Himmelstein, D. U., & Woolhandler, S. (2006) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2004.059402 · Cited by 609
Organisational culture and quality of health care
Davies, H. T. O., Nutley, S. M., & Mannion, R. (2000) · Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qhc.9.2.111 · Cited by 599
Barriers: The barriers to research utilization scale
Funk, S. G., Champagne, M. T., Wiese, R. A., & Tornquist, E. M. (1991) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80052-7 · Cited by 583
Pravikoff, D. S., Tanner, A. B., & Pierce, S. T. (2005) · AJN, American Journal of Nursing · doi:10.1097/00000446-200509000-00025 · Cited by 580
Brown, C. E., Wickline, M. A., Ecoff, L., & Glaser, D. (2009) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04878.x · Cited by 470 · cited 20×
“The BARRIERS to Research Utilization scale (Funk et al. 1991) was used in five studies (Fink et al. 2005, Karkos & Peters 2006, Atkinson et al. 2008, Brown et al. 2009, Schoonover 2009).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialDevelopment of an evidence‐based practice questionnaire for nurses
Upton, D., & Upton, P. (2006) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03739.x · Cited by 447
Cited by
Innovation Adoption: A Review of Theories and Constructs
Wisdom, J. P., Chor, K. H. B., Hoagwood, K. E., & Horwitz, S. M. (2014) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-013-0486-4 · Cited by 451
Majid, S., Foo, S., Luyt, B., Zhang, X., Theng, Y.-L., Chang, Y.-K., & Mokhtar, I. A. (2011) · Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA · doi:10.3163/1536-5050.99.3.010 · Cited by 450
Brous, P., Janssen, M., & Herder, P. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.05.008 · Cited by 348
Organizational Health Literacy: Review of Theories, Frameworks, Guides, and Implementation Issues
Farmanova, E., Bonneville, L., & Bouchard, L. (2018) · INQUIRY: The Journal of Health Care Organization, Provision, and Financing · doi:10.1177/0046958018757848 · Cited by 264
Barriers to GPs' use of evidence-based medicine: a systematic review
Zwolsman, S., te Pas, E., Hooft, L., Waard, M. W.-D., & van Dijk, N. (2012) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp12x652382 · Cited by 208
Metadata
- Authors
- SOLOMONS, N. M., & SPROSS, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Nursing Management
- Publisher
- Hindawi Limited
- Published
- 2010-12-13
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 109-120
- ISSN
- 0966-0429 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1748353183
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 29
- FWCI
- 19.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: an integrative review: EBP barriers and facilitators from a CQI perspective. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01144.x
- The paper
- SOLOMONS, N. M., & SPROSS, J. A. (2011). Evidence-based practice barriers and facilitators from a continuous quality improvement perspective: an integrative review: EBP barriers and facilitators from a CQI perspective. Journal of Nursing Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01144.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
