Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distinct affinity of nuclear proteins to the surface of chrysotile and crocidolite

Kubo, Yurika, Takenaka, Hiroyuki, Nagai, Hirotaka, Toyokuni, Shinya·2012·Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition

Abstract

The inhalation of asbestos is a risk factor for the development of malignant mesothelioma and lung cancer. Based on the broad surface area of asbestos fibers and their ability to enter the cytoplasm and nuclei of cells, it was hypothesized that proteins that adsorb onto the fiber surface play a role in the cytotoxicity and carcinogenesis of asbestos fibers. However, little is known about which proteins adsorb onto asbestos. Previously, we systematically identified asbestos-interacting proteins and classified them into eight sub-categories: chromatin/nucleotide/RNA-binding proteins, ribosomal proteins, cytoprotective proteins, cytoskeleton-associated proteins, histones and hemoglobin. Here, we report an adsorption profile of proteins for the three commercially used asbestos compounds: chrysotile, crocidolite and amosite. We quantified the amounts of adsorbed proteins by analyzing the silver-stained gels of sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis with ImageJ software, using the bands for amosite as a standard. We found that histones were most adsorptive to crocidolite and that chromatin-binding proteins were most adsorptive to chrysotile. The results suggest that chrysotile and crocidolite directly interact with chromatin structure through different mechanisms. Furthermore, RNA-binding proteins preferably interacted with chrysotile, suggesting that chrysotile may interfere with transcription and translation. Our results provide novel evidence demonstrating that the specific molecular interactions leading to carcinogenesis are different between chrysotile and crocidolite.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3164/jcbn.12-39

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. 1 Tweedale G. Sources in the history of occupational health: the Turner & Newall archive. Soc Hist Med 2000; 13: 515–533. · DOI
  2. 2 Toyokuni S. Mechanisms of asbestos-induced carcinogenesis. Nagoya J Med Sci 2009; 71: 1–10.
  3. 3 Hein MJ, Stayner LT, Lehman E, Dement JM. Follow-up study of chrysotile textile workers: cohort mortality and exposure-response. Occup Environ Med 2007; 64: 616–625. · DOI
  4. 4 Kazan-Allen L. Asbestos and mesothelioma: worldwide trends. Lung Cancer 2005; 49(Suppl 1): S3–S8. · DOI
  5. 5 Loomis D, Dement JM, Wolf SH, Richardson DB. Lung cancer mortality and fibre exposures among North Carolina asbestos textile workers. Occup Environ Med 2009; 66: 535–542. · DOI · Paper page
  6. 6 Robinson BW, Lake RA. Advances in malignant mesothelioma. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 1591–1603. · DOI · Paper page
  7. 7 Kazan-Allen L. Ban asbestos phenomenon: the winds of change. New Solut 2011; 21: 629–636. · DOI
  8. 8 Yang M. A current global view of environmental and occupational cancers. J Environ Sci Health C Environ Carcinog Ecotoxicol Rev 2011; 29: 223–249. · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2008.00934.x · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.abb.2010.06.015 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/0891-5849(92)90117-Y · DOI · Paper page
  12. 15 Maples KR, Johnson NF. Fiber-induced hydroxyl radical formation: correlation with mesothelioma induction in rats and humans. Carcinogenesis 1992; 13: 2035–2039. · DOI
  13. 16 Vallyathan V, Shi X. The role of oxygen free radicals in occupational and environmental lung diseases. Environ Health Perspect 1997; 105(Suppl 1): 165–177. · DOI
  14. 10.3109/10715762.2011.564170 · DOI
  15. 18 Hesterberg TW, Barrett JC. Induction by asbestos fibers of anaphase abnormalities: mechanism for aneuploidy induction and possibly carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis 1985; 6: 473–475. · DOI
  16. 21 Dopp E, Saedler J, Stopper H, Weiss DG, Schiffmann D. Mitotic disturbances and micronucleus induction in Syrian hamster embryo fibroblast cells caused by asbestos fibers. Environ Health Perspect 1995; 103: 268–271. · DOI
  17. 22 Dopp E, Schiffmann D. Analysis of chromosomal alterations induced by asbestos and ceramic fibers. Toxicol Lett 1998; 96–97: 155–162. · DOI
  18. 10.1038/275446a0 · DOI
  19. 24 DiPaolo JA, DeMarinis AJ, Doniger J. Asbestos and benzo(a)pyrene synergism in the transformation of Syrian hamster embryo cells. Pharmacology 1983; 27: 65–73. · DOI
  20. 25 Mossman BT, Eastman A, Bresnick E. Asbestos and benzo[a]pyrene act synergistically to induce squamous metaplasia and incorporation of [3H]thymidine in hamster tracheal epithelium. Carcinogenesis 1984; 5: 1401–1404. · DOI
  21. 10.1002/cm.20151 · DOI
  22. 28 O’Connell MJ, Ward RJ, Baum H, Peters TJ. Iron release from haemosiderin and ferritin by therapeutic and physiological chelators. Biochem J 1989; 260: 903–907. · DOI
  23. 10.1038/nature01322 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 31 Grivennikov SI, Greten FR, Karin M. Immunity, inflammation, and cancer. Cell 2010; 140: 883–899. · DOI · Paper page
  25. 33 Harington JS. Chemical studies of asbestos. Ann NY Acad Sci 1965; 132: 31–47. · DOI
  26. 34 Oshimura M, Hesterberg TW, Barrett JC. An early, nonrandom karyotypic change in immortal Syrian hamster cell lines transformed by asbestos: trisomy of chromosome 11. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1986; 22: 225–237. · DOI
  27. 35 Donaldson K, Brown GM, Brown DM, Bolton RE, Davis JM. Inflammation generating potential of long and short fibre amosite asbestos samples. Br J Ind Med 1989; 46: 271–276. · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/47412 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1038/468868a · DOI
  30. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199609)30:3<252::AID-AJIM2>3.0.CO;2-0 · DOI
  31. 41 IARC. Asbestos (chrysotile, amosite, crocidolite, tremolite, actinolite, and anthophyllite). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans A Review of Human Carcinogens; Part C: Arsenic, Metals, Fibres, and Dusts. Lyon, France, 2012. pp. 219–309.
  32. 43 Nymark P, Lindholm PM, Korpela MV, et al. Gene expression profiles in asbestos-exposed epithelial and mesothelial lung cell lines. BMC Genomics 2007; 8: 62. · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Kubo, Y., Takenaka, H., Nagai, H., & Toyokuni, S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition
Published
2012
ISSN
  • 0912-0009
  • 1880-5086
Cited by
0
References
6
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinct affinity of nuclear proteins to the surface of chrysotile and crocidolite. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3164/jcbn.12-39
The paper
Kubo, Y., Takenaka, H., Nagai, H., & Toyokuni, S. (2012). Distinct affinity of nuclear proteins to the surface of chrysotile and crocidolite. Journal of Clinical Biochemistry and Nutrition. https://doi.org/10.3164/jcbn.12-39

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.