Cited by 13Animal health and immunologyAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesVeterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia

Short communication: Effects of meloxicam administration on protein metabolism and growth performance in transported Jersey calves

Open access
Chibisa, G.E., Vinyard, J.R., Laarman, A.H.·2018·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Our objective was to investigate the effects of administering the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug meloxicam (MEL) before transport on various indicators of protein metabolism and growth performance over the first 96 h after transport in Jersey calves. Calves (age ± SD; 2 ± 1 d) sourced from a commercial farm were randomly administered, at 1 mg/kg of body weight, either meloxicam (MEL; n = 11) or a whey protein placebo (CON; n = 10) orally before transport to a calf facility (669 km; 8.5-h road trip). Calves were weighed and rectal temperature was recorded before departure (0 h), on arrival (8.5 h), and 96 h after arrival. Blood was collected at the same time as calves were weighed, and samples were analyzed for total protein (0-h sample), cortisol (0- and 8.5-h samples), haptoglobin (0- and 96-h samples), and amino acids, 3-methylhistidine, and urea-N (96 h). Milk replacer (MR) intake was recorded on arrival and over the next 4 d. Serum total protein concentration did not differ for CON and MEL calves. Plasma cortisol concentration was similar across treatments at 0 h; however, it was lower for CON than for MEL calves at 8.5 h. Although serum haptoglobin concentration tended to be greater for CON than MEL calves 96 h after transport, 3-methylhistidine and plasma urea-N concentrations did not differ across treatments. Plasma Asp, Asn, Glu, Lys, Met, Ser, and Trp were greater and plasma Arg, Gly, Pro, and Thr concentrations tended to be greater at 96 h after arrival for MEL compared with CON calves. Intake of MR and average daily gain were higher in MEL than in CON calves. In summary, although it had no effect on 3-methylhistidine or urea-N concentrations, administration of MEL before transport tended to reduce haptoglobin concentration, altered the amino acid profile, and was beneficial in preventing a decrease in MR intake and average daily gain in Jersey calves.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2018-14493

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Muscle damage and fatigue, highlighted by increasing levels of haptoglobin and CK, occur following extended periods of transportation.

    “For example, muscle damage and fatigue, highlighted by increasing levels of haptoglobin and CK, occur following extended periods of transportation”

    From A randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of transport duration and age at transport on surplus dairy calves: Part II. Impact on hematological variables. (2023) · cites this paper as Chibisa et al., 2018

    The passage on haptoglobin (section labeled Abstract; page unavailable) says that transportation can increase haptoglobin synthesis and that haptoglobin has been shown to peak about 96 hours after transport in feeder calves. The study did not measure CK or establish muscle damage or fatigue; it describes muscle wasting as a possibility and says its measured indicators did not differ between treatments. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chibisa, G. E., Vinyard, J. R., & Laarman, A. H.
Affiliations
University of Idaho (US)
Corresponding author
Chibisa, G.E.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2018-12
Volume
101
Issue
12
Pages
11435-11440
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2893022347
Cited by
13
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
  • National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Veterinary Pharmacology and Anesthesia
Keywords
meloxicam, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Jersey calves, protein metabolism, amino acid composition, haptoglobin, cortisol, 3-methylhistidine, urea-N, average daily gain, growth performance
MeSH terms
Meloxicam, Animals, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Body Weight, Cattle, Female, Haptoglobins, Hydrocortisone, Male, Proteins, Random Allocation, Stress, Physiological, Transportation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review