Cited by 14Animal health and immunologyRuminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Short communication: Hypernatremia in diarrheic calves associated with oral electrolyte administration in water and milk replacer in absence of access to water

Open access
Wilms, Juliette N., Leal, Leonel N., Martín-Tereso, Javier·2020·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

A major goal in treatment of calves with diarrhea is to restore hydration and to correct metabolic acidosis. This can be achieved by the administration of oral electrolyte solutions (OES). However, the composition of OES products and the administration protocols in practice vary widely, which can potentially compromise the efficacy and safety of these treatments. In particular, administration of OES in milk replacer (MR) and the absence of water supply in young calves are not unusual and these conditions could compromise calf health. In this light, the objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OES administered in MR and in water without access to water. Forty-five male Holstein calves (16.6 ± 1.6 d of age and 45.4 ± 2.2 kg at arrival) were purchased from a collection center located in the Netherlands. After arrival, calves went through an adaptation period of 4 d. Calves that developed diarrhea within 6 d after the end of the adaptation period were enrolled in the study, and the remaining calves were sold after being weaned. Upon morning detection of abnormal fecal scores (d 1 starting point), calves were blocked based on initial BW. Within each block, calves were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatments, including a control consisting of a small dose of whey (CON; n=12) and an OES treatment (OES; n=14). Treatments were blinded to the farm staff by randomly assigning a letter to each treatment. Treatments were simultaneously administered for 4 d in MR (2.5 L at 0800 and 1730 h) and in water (3 L at 1300 and 2200 h). Calves had no supplemental access to plain water. Blood samples were taken at 0600 h for 4 d, and fecal scores (0 = normal; 1=watery feces) were assessed daily at 0900 h for 15 consecutive days. Additionally, skin turgor and degree of enophthalmos were assessed at 1000 h from d 1 to 4 using a 3-level scoring system. Calves fed OES had a higher prevalence of diarrhea on d 3, 4, and 5 as well as higher prevalence of delayed skin turgor and increased degree of enophthalmos over the 4 monitoring days. Diarrhea duration was longer in calves receiving OES than in calves receiving CON (4.2 d vs. 2.1 d, respectively). The OES treatment resulted in hypernatremia (serum Na + >145 mmol/L) within 48 h after the first OES administration. Hypernatremia was linked with higher serum Cl − and urea concentrations and thus higher serum osmolarity in OES calves compared with CON calves. Administered under these conditions, OES resulted in various degrees of hypernatremia and a delayed recovery from diarrhea, thus defeating the purpose of OES administration.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.2019-17371

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 17 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Beede, D. K. 2005. The most essential nutrient: Water. Pages 13- 32 in Proc. 7th Western Dairy Management Conference, Reno, NV. http: / / www .msu .edu/ ~beede/ Water _MostEssentialNutrient _Beede _Mar20051 .pdf.
  2. USDA. 2016. Dairy 2014: Dairy cattle management practices in the United States. Pages 120-140 in National Animal Health Monitor- ing Systems. Section I: Population estimates-C. Preweaned heifer management. USDA, Washington, DC.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilms, J. N., Leal, L. N., & Martín-Tereso, J.
Corresponding author
Wilms, Juliette N.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2020-06
Volume
103
Issue
6
Pages
5495-5500
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3016687040
Cited by
14
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
hypernatremia, calf diarrhea, oral electrolyte solution, milk replacer, water restriction, dehydration, skin turgor, enophthalmos, Holstein calves, whey, electrolyte safety, metabolic acidosis, fecal score
MeSH terms
Whey, Administration, Oral, Animals, Body Weight, Cattle, Cattle Diseases, Diarrhea, Electrolytes, Feces, Hypernatremia, Male, Netherlands, Random Allocation, Water, Weaning, Milk Substitutes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review