Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 167

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of pH and pH Fluctuations on Microbial Fermentation and Nutrient Flow from a Dual-Flow Continuous Culture System

Open access
Calsamiglia, S., Ferret, A., Devant, M.·2002·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Eight dual-flow continuous culture fermenters (1400 ml) were used in two consecutive periods to study the effects of pH and pH fluctuations on microbial fermentation and nutrient flow. Fermenters were maintained at 39 degrees C, with solid and liquid dilution rates of 5 and 10%/h, respectively, and fed continuously a 60% alfalfa hay and 40% concentrate diet (18.9% crude protein, 36.6% neutral detergent fiber, 17.6% acid detergent fiber). Treatments were high pH (constant at 6.4); low pH (constant at 5.7); cycles of 4 h at pH 6.4 and 4 h at pH 5.7; and pH constant at 6.4, except for two 30-min drops per day to pH 5.7, followed by a 3-h slow recovery to pH 6.4. The low pH (constant at 5.7) produced lower apparent dry matter, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber digestion, lower total and branch-chained volatile fatty acid concentrations, and lower acetate and higher propionate proportions than high pH (constant at 6.4). There were no differences in these estimates between constant high pH and the two treatments that alternated high pH and low pH. The constant low pH reduced protein degradation and increased nonammonia N and dietary N flow compared with constant high pH. The pH treatments had no effect on bacterial N flow or efficiency of microbial protein synthesis. Flow of essential amino acids was highest for constant low pH and lowest for constant high pH. Results indicate that constant low pH reduced fiber and protein digestion and increased the flow of total and some individual amino acids. However, the effects of transitory decreases of pH were either small or insignificant with the conditions tested in this study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74111-8

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 167

Metadata

Authors
Calsamiglia, S., Ferret, A., & Devant, M.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
2002-03
Volume
85
Issue
3
Pages
574-579
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026573438
Cited by
167
References
2
FWCI
11.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of pH and pH Fluctuations on Microbial Fermentation and Nutrient Flow from a Dual-Flow Continuous Culture System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74111-8
The paper
Calsamiglia, S., Ferret, A., & Devant, M. (2002). Effects of pH and pH Fluctuations on Microbial Fermentation and Nutrient Flow from a Dual-Flow Continuous Culture System. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74111-8

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.