The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Effects of pH and pH Fluctuations on Microbial Fermentation and Nutrient Flow from a Dual-Flow Continuous Culture System
Open accessAbstract
Eight dual-flow continuous culture fermenters (1400 ml) were used in two consecutive periods to study the effects of pH and pH fluctuations on microbial fermentation and nutrient flow. Fermenters were maintained at 39 degrees C, with solid and liquid dilution rates of 5 and 10%/h, respectively, and fed continuously a 60% alfalfa hay and 40% concentrate diet (18.9% crude protein, 36.6% neutral detergent fiber, 17.6% acid detergent fiber). Treatments were high pH (constant at 6.4); low pH (constant at 5.7); cycles of 4 h at pH 6.4 and 4 h at pH 5.7; and pH constant at 6.4, except for two 30-min drops per day to pH 5.7, followed by a 3-h slow recovery to pH 6.4. The low pH (constant at 5.7) produced lower apparent dry matter, neutral detergent fiber and acid detergent fiber digestion, lower total and branch-chained volatile fatty acid concentrations, and lower acetate and higher propionate proportions than high pH (constant at 6.4). There were no differences in these estimates between constant high pH and the two treatments that alternated high pH and low pH. The constant low pH reduced protein degradation and increased nonammonia N and dietary N flow compared with constant high pH. The pH treatments had no effect on bacterial N flow or efficiency of microbial protein synthesis. Flow of essential amino acids was highest for constant low pH and lowest for constant high pH. Results indicate that constant low pH reduced fiber and protein digestion and increased the flow of total and some individual amino acids. However, the effects of transitory decreases of pH were either small or insignificant with the conditions tested in this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Van Soest, P. J., Robertson, J. B., & Lewis, B. A. (1991) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78551-2 · Cited by 28,658
Russell, J. B. (1998) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75886-2 · Cited by 363
Cited by
Nitrogen metabolism in the rumen
Bach, A., Calsamiglia, S., & Stern, M. D. (2005) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(05)73133-7 · Cited by 1,311
Self-citationRuminal Acidosis in Beef Cattle: The Current Microbiological and Nutritional Outlook
Nagaraja, T. G., & Titgemeyer, E. C. (2007) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2006-478 · Cited by 873
Metadata
- Authors
- Calsamiglia, S., Ferret, A., & Devant, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 2002-03
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 574-579
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2026573438
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of pH and pH Fluctuations on Microbial Fermentation and Nutrient Flow from a Dual-Flow Continuous Culture System. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74111-8
- The paper
- Calsamiglia, S., Ferret, A., & Devant, M. (2002). Effects of pH and pH Fluctuations on Microbial Fermentation and Nutrient Flow from a Dual-Flow Continuous Culture System. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(02)74111-8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.