Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,514

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prediction of the Energy Value of Cow's Milk

Open access
Tyrrell, H.F., Reid, J.T.·1965·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

The quantification of lactation response requires that various yields of milk of various chemical compositions be equated to a common term.Although the gross energy value is the most common characteristic to which all organic substances can be reduced, its direct measurement is expensive.As a consequence, a study was made of the relationships among the energy value and the concentrations of total solids, solids-not-fat (SNF), fat, protein, lactose, and ash in 600 two-and seven-day composite samples of milk from 42 Holstein cows and ranging from 1.6 to 6.4% fat.An analysis of 21 different combinations of milk components showed that the most practical equation for the accurate prediction (C.V. = 1.3%) of the energy value of milks having a wide range of chemical composition is : Energy (kcal/lb) = 41.84 (% fat) + 22.29 (% SNF) --25.58.From this, the following equation was derived to compute the solids-corrected milk (SCM) yield containing 340 kcal of energy per pound: SCM (lb) = 12.3 (F) + 6.56 (SNF) --0.0752 (M); where F, SNF, and M are expressed as pounds of fat, solids-not-fat, and milk, respectively.This equation predicted the milk energy outPut of cows producing low-fat milk effected by dietary means as accurately as that of normal milk.The Gaines 4% FCM equation underestimated by as much as 15% the energy output in milk containing less than 3% of fat.To quantify the lactation response of cows, some expression is required which equates to a common term various outputs of milk having various concentrations of chemical components.The gross energy (or heat of combustion) value represents the most common characteristic to which all organic substances can be reduced.However, the direct measurement of the gross energy value is expensive of time and money and, therefore, is impractical to employ in many situations.In lieu of using gross energy as the basis of equating the milk output, Gaines (3) in 1928 proposed the use of 4% fat-corrected milk (4% FCM, to be abbreviated hereafter, FCM).The accuracy of Gaines' equation for estimat-

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(65)88430-2

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,514

Metadata

Authors
Tyrrell, H. F., & Reid, J. T.
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
1965-09
Volume
48
Issue
9
Pages
1215-1223
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1554671550
Cited by
1,514
References
0
FWCI
9.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction of the Energy Value of Cow's Milk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(65)88430-2
The paper
Tyrrell, H. F., & Reid, J. T. (1965). Prediction of the Energy Value of Cow's Milk. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(65)88430-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.