Cited by 6Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsAnimal health and immunologyMicrobial infections and disease research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Therapy of Experimentally Induced Coliform Mastitis with a Propionibacterium acnes Product

Open access
Hogan, J.S., Smith, K.L., Todhunter, D.A., Schoenberger, P.S.·1994·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

The efficacy of a Propionibacterium acnes product for treatment of coliform mastitis was evaluated following intramammary infusion of Escherichia coli. Ten cows were injected intravenously with a product containing heat-killed P. acnes at 3 h, 3 d, and 7 d after bacterial challenge. Five cows served as untreated negative controls. Bacterial counts in milk, rectal temperatures, and milk SCC did not differ between treated cows and control cows. Intravenous infusion of P. acnes had no effect on milk production or DMI of treated cows compared with untreated controls. Therapy of experimentally induced coliform mastitis with a P. acnes product had no effect on severity or duration of clinical signs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(94)76974-5

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The intramammary challenge model using E. coli 727 has consistently produced mild clinical coliform mastitis in the current and two previous trials.

    “The intramammary challenge model using E. coli 727 has consistently produced mild clinical coliform mastitis in the current and two previous trials (6, 11).”

    From Effects of an Escherichia coli J5 Vaccine on Mild Clinical Coliform Mastitis (1995) · cites this paper as [6]

    The Bacterial Challenge section identifies E. coli 727 as the intramammary challenge strain, and the Results state that all challenged cows developed clinical mastitis. The passages do not characterize the disease as mild or establish that this model produced mild mastitis consistently across two previous trials. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Intramammary challenge with E. coli 487 consistently caused more severe clinical signs of mastitis than did intramammary challenge with E. coli 727.

    “Intramarnmary challenge with E. coli 487 (7) consistently caused more severe clinical signs of mastitis than did intramammary challenge with E. coli 727 (6, 11).”
  • Although local signs of clinical mastitis were reduced by vaccination with E. coli J5 in the current trial, the use of a Propionibacterium acnes immunostimulant and vaccination with a curli-producing strain of E. coli did not alter the dynamics of IMI and clinical signs following intramammary infusion of E. coli 727.

    “Although local signs of clinical mastitis were reduced by vaccination with E. coli J5 in the current trial, the use of a Propionibacterium acnes immunostimulant (6) and vaccination with a curli-producing strain of E. coli (11) did not alter the dynamics of IMI and clinical signs following intramammary infusion of E. coli 727.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Corrier, 1989, Suppression ofresistance to Salmonella typhimurium in young chickens inoculated with Corynebacterium parvum, AvianDis., 33, 791
  2. Evans, 1988, Inactivated Propionibacterium acnes as adjunct to conventional therapy in the treatment of equine respiratory diseases, Equine Pract., 10, 17
  3. Furowicz, 1990, Evaluation of sheep immunostimulation with the strain of Propionibacterium acnes CN 5936 in the prophylaxis of listeriosis, Pol. Arch. Vet., 30, 3
  4. Pulverer, 1988, Granulocyte activating factorreleased from Propionibacterium acnes, A possiblemediator of inflammation in acnes vulgans Zentralbl. Bakterioi., 270, 246

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hogan, J. S., Smith, K. L., Todhunter, D. A., & Schoenberger, P. S.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
1994-02
Volume
77
Issue
2
Pages
462-467
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003116785
Cited by
6
References
20
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ohio State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal health and immunology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
coliform mastitis, Propionibacterium acnes, heat-killed bacteria, intramammary infusion, intravenous infusion, Escherichia coli challenge, dairy cattle, mastitis treatment efficacy, somatic cell count, milk production, dry matter intake
MeSH terms
Adjuvants, Immunologic, Animals, Cattle, Escherichia coli, Escherichia coli Infections, Female, Lactation, Mastitis, Bovine, Milk, Pregnancy, Propionibacterium acnes, Time Factors, Colony Count, Microbial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review