Cited by 266Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsGenetic and phenotypic traits in livestockMicrobial infections and disease research

Field Survey of Clinical Mastitis in Low Somatic Cell Count Herds

Open access
Hogan, J.S., Smith, K.L., Hoblet, K.H., Schoenberger, P.S., Todhunter, D.A., Hueston, W.D., Pritchard, D.E., Bowman, G.L. +3 more·1989·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Nine commercial dairy herds, each with low herd milk somatic cell counts, were monitored for 1 yr to determine prevalence of intramammary infections and rates of clinical mastitis. Staphylococcus species was the bacterial group most frequently isolated from quarters at calving and at drying off. Environmental streptococci and coliform intramammary infections totaled less than 6% of quarters at both calving and at drying off. Staphylococcus aureus were isolated from less than 1% of quarters and Streptococcus agalactiae from 0% of quarters at both calving and drying off. A total of 646 clinical cases of mastitis were diagnosed in 548 quarters of 406 cows. Mean rate of clinical mastitis among herds was .457 clinical cases/305 cow-days. Rates of clinical mastitis ranged among herds from .273 to .748 clinical cases/305 cow-days. Coliforms and bacteriologically negative and environmental streptococci accounted for 82.3% of clinical cases. Rates of clinical mastitis and severity of clinical signs differed among herds, seasons of the year, parity groups, and stages of lactation. Rates of clinical mastitis were highest during summer, in first lactation cows, and during the first 7 d of lactation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(89)79266-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Only about 10% of clinical coliform cases result in systemic signs including fever, anorexia, and altered respiration.

    “Only about 10% of clinical coliform cases result in systemic signs including fever, anorexia, and altered respiration [25, 55].”

    From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Clinical Mastitis Severity Codes section defines code 5 as including systemic signs. The Mastitis Severity Codes results report that 29.2% of clinical coliform cases were code 5, contrary to the claimed approximately 10%. Our copy does not specify fever, anorexia, or altered respiration as those signs. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies in the United States and Europe consistently report that approximately 40% of clinical cases are the result of Gram-negative bacteria.

    “The percentage distribution of Gram-negative bacteria causing clinical mastitis is herd dependant, but studies in the United States and Europe consistently report that appropriately 40% of clinical cases are the result of Gram-negative bacteria [25, 27, 55, 57].”

    From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Distribution of Clinical Cases by Bacteriological Status section reports 29.7% coliform cases and 6.5% nonlactose-fermenting cases; the paper identifies the latter as Gram-negative bacilli. Together, these account for about 36% of cases in the herds studied, reasonably close to 40%. The paper does not establish that studies across the United States and Europe consistently find that proportion; its comparison with United Kingdom herds concerns overall mastitis rates, not the Gram-negative percentage. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Intramammary infections caused by Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. often are chronic infections that may persist multiple lactations.

    “Intramammary infections caused by Serratia spp. and Pseudomonas spp. often are chronic infections that may persist multiple lactations [25].”

    From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Rates of Clinical Mastitis section reports that 31.0% of cases involving nonlactose-fermenting gram-negative bacilli were potential repeat cases, and relates this finding to high clinical recurrence among pseudomonads. The paper does not identify Serratia in that finding or establish that infections were chronic or persisted across multiple lactations; the herds were monitored for one year. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The high frequency of clinical cases and relatively short duration of Gram-negative bacterial intramammary infections render individual cow SCC and bulk tank SCC poor indicators of the prevalence of disease caused by these bacteria.

    “The high frequency of clinical cases and relatively short duration of Gram-negative bacterial intramammary infections render the use of individual cow SCC and bulk tank SCC as poor indicators of the prevalence of disease caused by these bacteria [13, 20, 25, 57].”

    From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Conclusions (page unavailable) state that herds with low somatic cell counts can still have unacceptable frequencies of intramammary infections and clinical cases caused by environmental pathogens. The paper also reports frequent coliform clinical cases, but it does not establish that Gram-negative infections are relatively short-lived or assess whether individual-cow and bulk-tank SCC are poor indicators of their prevalence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Coliform bacteria are the culprits of 60 to 70% of peracute clinical cases.

    “Survey averages suggest that coliform bacteria are the culprits of 60 to 70% of peracute clinical cases [25, 55].”

    From Coliform mastitis (2003) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Mastitis Severity Codes section defines code 5 as cases with abnormal milk, quarter swelling, and systemic signs. The severity-code results and Table 2 report that coliforms accounted for 58.9% of code 5 cases, approximately the lower end of the claimed range. The paper does not identify these cases as “peracute” or report a figure approaching 70%. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Elxxhart, R. J., R. P. Natzke, F.H.S. Newbould, B. Nonnecke, and P. S. Thompson. 1979. Coliform mastiffs -a review. J. Dairy Sci. 62:1.
  2. Koncman, E. W., S. D. Allen, V. R. Dowcll, and H. M. Sommcr. 1983. The enterobacteriaceae. Pages 57-124 in Color atlas and textbook of diagnostic microbiology. 2nd ed. J. B. Lippincott Co., New York, NY.
  3. Pearson, J.K.L., and D. P. Mackie. 1979. Factors associ- ated with the occurrence, cause, and outcome of clinical mastiffs in dairy cattle. Vet. Res. 105:456.
  4. Wilesmith, J. W., P. G. Francis, and C. D. Wilson. 1986. Incidence of clinical mastiffs in a cohort of British dairy herds. Vet. Rcc. 118:199. Joulll~ of Dairy Science Vol. 72, No. 6, 1989

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hogan, J. S., Smith, K. L., Hoblet, K. H., Schoenberger, P. S., Todhunter, D. A., Hueston, W. D., Pritchard, D. E., Bowman, G. L., Heider, L. E., Brockett, B. L., & Conrad, H. R.
Affiliations
The Ohio State University (US)
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
1989-06
Volume
72
Issue
6
Pages
1547-1556
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2101489834
Cited by
266
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 10
FWCI
9.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Ohio State University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy Cows
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Microbial infections and disease research
Keywords
clinical mastitis, dairy cattle, intramammary infection, Staphylococcus, coliform bacteria, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus agalactiae, mastitis prevalence, calving, dry-off, parity, lactation stage, seasonal variation
MeSH terms
Animals, Cattle, Cell Count, Enterobacteriaceae, Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Female, Lactation, Mastitis, Bovine, Pregnancy, Seasons, Staphylococcal Infections, Staphylococcus, Streptococcal Infections, Streptococcus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review