Cited by 22Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAgricultural Engineering and MechanizationPostharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management

Effect of Modified Atmospheres on Proteolysis and Fermentation of Ensiled Alfalfa

Open access
Makoni, N.F., Broderick, G.A., Muck, R.E.·1997·Journal of Dairy Science

Abstract

Two studies evaluated the proteolysis of alfalfa that was ensiled in laboratory silos under different modified atmospheres.In the first study, fourthcutting alfalfa was ensiled at 25% dry matter (DM) for 28 d.The forage treatments were a modified atmosphere of 3% O 2 :20% CO 2 :77% N 2 , or formic acid ( 6 ml/kg of fresh weight); an untreated control was used for comparison.Proteolysis was assessed from the concentrations of NH 3 N, free amino acid (AA) N, and nonprotein N (NPN).Peptide N was estimated as the difference between total NPN and the sum of NH 3 N plus free AA N. Higher silage pH and lower concentrations of total organic acids suggested that the modified atmosphere reduced forage fermentation.The modified atmosphere was effective in reducing proteolysis to a level similar to that achieved with formic acid.Alfalfa ensiled under the modified atmosphere had more peptide N than did alfalfa ensiled with formic acid, which may be advantageous.In the second study, alfalfa was ensiled at 20 and 28% DM as an untreated control or treated with N 2 gas or a modified atmosphere composed of 3% O 2 :15% CO 2 :82% N 2 .The NH 3 N concentrations were higher in alfalfa ensiled at 28% DM under N 2 gas or the modified atmosphere.Concentrations of free AA N were lower at the higher DM percentage for all treatments.Concentrations of NPN were reduced 7.0% for low DM ensiled under N 2 , 7.0% for high DM ensiled under N 2 , 23.4% for low DM ensiled under a modified atmosphere, and 25.7% for high DM ensiled under a modified atmosphere.Modified atmospheres reduced the rate and extent of NPN formation in alfalfa silage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(97)76014-4

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Mertens, D. R. 1991. Critical conditions in determining deter- gent fibers. Page 5 in Proc. Natl. Forage Testing Assn. Forage Analysis Workshop. Univ. Wisconsin, Univ. Minnesota Ext. Serv., Madison, WI.
  2. SAS ® User's Guide: Statistics, Version 5 Edition. 1985. SAS Inst., Inc., Cary, NC.
  3. Woolford, M. K. 1984. The Fermentation of Silage. Microbiology Series. Vol. 14. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, NY.

Cited by

Authors
Makoni, N. F., Broderick, G. A., & Muck, R. E.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Venue
Journal of Dairy Science
Published
1997-05
Volume
80
Issue
5
Pages
912-920
ISSN
0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041662356
Cited by
22
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Journal of Dairy Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Postharvest Quality and Shelf Life Management
Keywords
alfalfa silage, proteolysis, silage fermentation, formic acid treatment, non-protein nitrogen, free amino acids, ammonia nitrogen, peptide nitrogen, silage pH, organic acids, nitrogen loss

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review