Cited by 31Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyCrop Yield and Soil FertilityAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

Chemical composition of corn silage produced by scientific studies in Brazil—A meta-analysis

Open access
Zardin, Pagiel Bernardi, Velho, João Pedro, Jobim, Clóves Cabreira, Alessio, Dileta Regina Moro, Haygert-Velho, Ione Maria Pereira, Conceição, Gabriel Menegazzi da, Almeida, Paulo Sérgio Gois·2017·Semina Ciências Agrárias

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to perform a meta-analysis that compared the chemical composition of corn silage produced for different experimental purposes, i.e., by research groups that studied corn silage (SCS) or by research groups that only used corn silage (UCS) as a form of roughage. We analyzed 203 papers that were published between January 1994 and December 2014 and contained a total of 647 treatments and the analysis of 1701 silos. We found a significant difference (P < 0.0001) in the dry matter (DM) content of SCS silage (33.00%) and that of UCS silage (30.64%). The DM contents of neutral detergent fiber for the SCS and UCS silage were high (54.72 and 55.14% DM, respectively) but were not significantly different from one another (P = 0.5936), and the acid detergent fiber content of the UCS silage (31.04% DM) was higher than that of the SCS silage (29.65%, P = 0.0214), which indicated that the UCS silage was less digestible than the SCS silage. This was also corroborated (P = 0.0064) by the mean content of total digestible nutrients (64.18% DM) in the UCS silage, which likely results from the lower level of care taken when using standard silage production methods, compared to that taken by SCS researchers. Therefore, we concluded that the corn silage produced by research groups in Brazil are not analyzed in full and that, as a result, there is a paucity of important information, such as the content of organic acids. In addition, we also found that corn silage produced in Brazil contains a high level of neutral detergent fiber.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5433/1679-0359.2017v38n1p503

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. FERREIRA, J. J. Estágio de maturação ideal para ensilagem do milho e do sorgo. In: CRUZ, J. C.; PEREIRA FILHO, I. A.; RODRIGUES, J. A. S.; FERREIRA, J. J. (Ed.). Produção e utilização de silagem de milho e sorgo. Sete Lagoas: Embrapa Milho e Sorgo, 2001. p. 405-428.
  2. RESENDE, F. D. de; SIGNORETTI, R. D.; COAN, R. M.; SIQUEIRA, G. R. Terminação de bovinos de corte com ênfase na utilização de volumosos conservados. In: REIS, R. A.; SIQUEIRA, G. R.; BERTIPAGLIA, L. M. A.; OLIVEIRA, A. P.; MELO, G. M. P.; BERNARDES, T. F. (Ed.). Volumosos na produção de ruminantes . Jaboticabal: Fundação de Apoio à Pesquisa, Ensino e Extensão, FUNEP, 2005. v. 1, p. 83-106.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zardin, P. B., Velho, J. P., Jobim, C. C., Alessio, D. R. M., Haygert-Velho, I. M. P., Conceição, G. M. D., & Almeida, P. S. G.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual de Maringá (BR)
  • Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (BR)
Venue
Semina Ciências Agrárias
Published
2017-03-02
Volume
38
Issue
1
Pages
503
ISSN
  • 1676-546X (ISSN-L)
  • 1679-0359
OpenAlex
W2592082608
Cited by
31
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Semina Ciências Agrárias (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia
  • Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos (01/2010)
  • Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Crop Yield and Soil Fertility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
corn silage, chemical composition, dry matter content, neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber, total digestible nutrients, silage digestibility, organic acids, roughage, silage quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review