The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence of Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Herds Grouped in Three Categories by Bulk Milk Somatic Cell Counts
Open accessAbstract
Incidence of clinical mastitis was studied in 274 herds grouped in three categories by bulk milk somatic cell count (SCC). Mean incidence rate of clinical mastitis was 0.278, 0.257, and 0.252 cases per 365 cow-days at risk in herds with low (< or = 150,000), medium (150,000 to 250,000), and high (250,000 to 400,000 cells/ml) bulk milk SCC, respectively. The incidence rate of clinical mastitis was not different among the three categories. Variance in the incidence of clinical mastitis among herds increased as bulk milk SCC decreased. Clinical mastitis caused by Gram-negative pathogens, such as Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., or Pseudomonas spp., occurred more often in herds with a low bulk milk SCC. Clinical mastitis caused by Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus dysgalactiae, and Streptococcus agalactiae occurred more often in herds with a high bulk milk SCC. Systemic signs of illness caused by clinical mastitis occurred more often in herds with a low bulk milk SCC. Both overall culling rate and culling rate for clinical mastitis were not different among groups catergorized by bulk milk SCC. In herds with a high bulk milk SCC, however, more cows that produced milk with a high SCC were culled. In herds with a low bulk milk SCC, more cows were culled for teat lesions, milkability, udder shape, fertility, and character than were cows in herds with a high bulk milk SCC. In herds with a low bulk milk SCC, cows were also culled more for export and production reasons.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Herd management and prevalence of mastitis in dairy herds with high and low somatic cell counts
Erskine, R. J., Eberhart, R. J., Hutchinson, L. J., & Spencer, S. B. (1987) · Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association · doi:10.2460/javma.1987.190.11.1411 · Cited by 80
Cited by
Bovine mastitis and intramammary drug delivery: review and perspectives
Gruet, P., Maincent, P., Berthelot, X., & Kaltsatos, V (2001) · Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0169-409x(01)00160-0 · Cited by 272
The Effect of Season on Somatic Cell Count and the Incidence of Clinical Mastitis
Olde Riekerink, R. G. M., Barkema, H. W., & Stryhn, H. (2007) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2006-567 · Cited by 260
Self-citationLow Somatic Cell Count: a Risk Factor for Subsequent Clinical Mastitis in a Dairy Herd
Suriyasathaporn, W., Schukken, Y. H., Nielen, M., & Brand, A. (2000) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(00)74991-5 · Cited by 172
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barkema, H. W., Schukken, Y. H., Lam, T. J. G. M., Beiboer, M. L., Wilmink, H., Benedictus, G., & Brand, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1998-02
- Volume
- 81
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 411-419
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2073417271
- Cited by
- 486
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Herds Grouped in Three Categories by Bulk Milk Somatic Cell Counts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75591-2
- The paper
- Barkema, H. W., Schukken, Y. H., Lam, T. J. G. M., Beiboer, M. L., Wilmink, H., Benedictus, G., & Brand, A. (1998). Incidence of Clinical Mastitis in Dairy Herds Grouped in Three Categories by Bulk Milk Somatic Cell Counts. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(98)75591-2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.