The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Isolation and Characterization of Acid- and Bile-Tolerant Isolates from Strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus
Open accessAbstract
Lactic acid bacteria have been reported to be useful as a health adjunct and are commonly added to food as the delivery mechanism. The literature contains many conflicting observations for their proposed benefits, and the mechanism of action is undefined. One source of variation is the large number of strains used without proper controls supplemented. Additionally, many of the organisms are not characterized for their acid shock response or the acid-tolerance response, which are known to vary among bacterial species. Our objective was to isolate acid-resistant and bile-resistant variants of Lactobacillus acidophilus and to determine the phenotypic changes. The acid- and bile-tolerant isolates were obtained using natural selection techniques after sequential exposure to hydrochloric acid (pH 3.5 to 7.0) and mixed bile salts. The acid- and bile-tolerant isolates retained their ability to grow at pH 3.5 with 0.3% bile after the selective pressure was removed and reapplied. Isolates varied from their parents for stability in freezing, lactose utilization, protease activity, aminopeptidase activity, plasmid profile, and cell-wall fatty acid profile. These data suggest that the isolated acid- and bile-tolerant isolates possess growth advantages over that of the parents under stress conditions and may be considered as candidates for probiotic strains after further characterization with animal models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Bifidobacterium from Fermented Milks: Survival During Gastric Transit
Berrada, N., Lemeland, J.-F., Laroche, G., Thouvenot, P., & Piaia, M. (1991) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(91)78183-6 · Cited by 203
Cited by
Production of gaba (γ - aminobutyric acid) by microorganisms: a review
Dhakal, R., Bajpai, V. K., & Baek, K.-H. (2012) · Brazilian Journal of Microbiology · doi:10.1590/s1517-83822012000400001 · Cited by 545
Bile resistance mechanisms in Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium
Ruiz, L., Margolles, A., & Sánchez, B. (2013) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2013.00396 · Cited by 548
Interactions between Bacteria and Bile Salts in the Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Tracts
Urdaneta, V., & Casadesús, J. (2017) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2017.00163 · Cited by 449
Synthesis of γ-Aminobutyric Acid by Lactic Acid Bacteria Isolated from a Variety of Italian Cheeses
Siragusa, S., De Angelis, M., Di Cagno, R., Rizzello, C. G., Coda, R., & Gobbetti, M. (2007) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.01064-07 · Cited by 438
Succi, M., Tremonte, P., Reale, A., Sorrentino, E., Grazia, L., Pacifico, S., & Coppola, R. (2005) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2005.01.037 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Chou, L.-S., & Weimer, B.
- Venue
- Journal of Dairy Science
- Publisher
- American Dairy Science Association
- Published
- 1999-01
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23-31
- ISSN
- 0022-0302 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2108510072
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolation and Characterization of Acid- and Bile-Tolerant Isolates from Strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75204-5
- The paper
- Chou, L.-S., & Weimer, B. (1999). Isolation and Characterization of Acid- and Bile-Tolerant Isolates from Strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus. Journal of Dairy Science. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(99)75204-5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.