Cited by 22Vagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchNeurological disorders and treatmentsEpilepsy research and treatment

Complete removal of vagus nerve stimulator generator and electrodes: Technical note

Ortler, Martin, Unterhofer, Claudia, Dobesberger, Judith, Haberlandt, Edda, Trinka, Eugen·2010·Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics

Abstract

Vagus nerve stimulation has become widely used in the palliative treatment of refractory epilepsy. Removal of a vagus nerve stimulator may be desirable or even necessary due to lack of efficacy, intolerable side effects, signs of infection, or failure of the device. Unless the lead or the helical electrodes are defective, only the generator is explanted and the electrodes are usually left behind for fear of damaging nerve or surrounding structures. The authors review their experience with complete removal of the stimulating electrodes and pacemaker-like generator device in 9 consecutive patients, 3 of whom were children. Using microsurgical techniques, the authors were able to completely remove the stimulator, including electrodes in all patients. All nerves remained morphologically intact. One case of temporary and one of permanent clinically silent ipsilateral vocal cord paresis were observed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/2009.9.peds0810

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ortler, M., Unterhofer, C., Dobesberger, J., Haberlandt, E., & Trinka, E.
Affiliations
  • Innsbruck Medical University (AT)
  • Clinical Departments of Neurosurgery
  • Neurology, and
Corresponding author
Ortler, Martin
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
Published
2010-02
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
191-194
ISSN
  • 1933-0707 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-0715
OpenAlex
W1504000282
Cited by
22
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurosurgery Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
Keywords
vagus nerve stimulation, electrode removal, helical electrodes, microsurgical technique, drug-resistant epilepsy, pediatric epilepsy, vocal cord paresis, nerve injury
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Preschool, Electrodes, Implanted, Electric Stimulation Therapy, Epilepsy, Female, Humans, Male, Microsurgery, Postoperative Complications, Vagus Nerve, Vocal Cord Paralysis, Neurosurgical Procedures, Device Removal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review