The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Vagus nerve stimulation for children with treatment-resistant epilepsy: a consecutive series of 141 cases: Clinical article
Open accessAbstract
Object: The authors undertook this study to analyze the efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in a large consecutive series of children 18 years of age and younger with treatment-resistant epilepsy and compare the safety and efficacy in children under 12 years of age with the outcomes in older children. Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed 141 consecutive cases involving children (75 girls and 66 boys) with treatment-resistant epilepsy in whom primary VNS implantation was performed by the senior author between November 1997 and April 2008 and who had at least 1 year of follow-up since implantation. The patients' mean age at vagus nerve stimulator insertion was 11.1 years (range 1–18 years). Eighty-six children (61.0%) were younger than 12 years at time of VNS insertion (which constitutes off-label usage of this device). Results: Follow-up was complete for 91.8% of patients and the mean duration of VNS therapy in these patients was 5.2 years (range 25 days–11.4 years). Seizure frequency significantly improved with VNS therapy (mean reduction 58.9%, p < 0.0001) without a significant reduction in antiepileptic medication burden (median number of antiepileptic drugs taken 3, unchanged). Reduction in seizure frequency of at least 50% occurred in 64.8% of patients and 41.4% of patients experienced at least a 75% reduction. Major (3) and minor (6) complications occurred in 9 patients (6.4%) and included 1 deep infection requiring device removal, 1 pneumothorax, 2 superficial infections treated with antibiotics, 1 seroma/hematoma treated with aspiration, persistent cough in 1 patient, severe but transient neck pain in 1 patient, and hoarseness in 2 patients. There was no difference in efficacy or complications between children 12 years of age and older (FDA-approved indication) and those younger than 12 years of age (off-label usage). Linear regression analyses did not identify any demographic and clinical variables that predicted response to VNS. Conclusions: Vagus nerve stimulation is a safe and effective treatment for treatment-resistant epilepsy in young adults and children. Over 50% of patients experienced at least 50% reduction in seizure burden. Children younger than 12 years had a response similar to that of older children with no increase in complications. Given the efficacy of this device and the devastating effects of persistent epilepsy during critical developmental epochs, randomized trials are needed to potentially expand the indications for VNS to include younger children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Early Identification of Refractory Epilepsy
Kwan, P., & Brodie, M. J. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200002033420503 · Cited by 5,204
Ben‐Menachem, E., Mañon‐Espaillat, R., Ristanovic, R., Wilder, B. J., Stefan, H., Mirza, W., Tarver, W. B., Wernicke, J. F., & First International Vagus Nerve Stimulation Study Group (1994) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/j.1528-1157.1994.tb02482.x · Cited by 683
Cited by
A review of vagus nerve stimulation as a therapeutic intervention
Johnson, R. L., & Wilson, C. G. (2018) · Journal of Inflammation Research · doi:10.2147/jir.s163248 · Cited by 562
Morris, G. L., Gloss, D., Buchhalter, J., Mack, K. J., Nickels, K., & Harden, C. (2013) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3182a393d1 · Cited by 450
Orosz, I., McCormick, D., Zamponi, N., Varadkar, S., Feucht, M., Parain, D., Griens, R., Vallée, L., Boon, P., Rittey, C., et al. (2014) · Epilepsia · doi:10.1111/epi.12762 · Cited by 269
Human vagus nerve branching in the cervical region.
Hammer, N., Glätzner, J., Feja, C., Kühne, C., Meixensberger, J., Planitzer, U., Schleifenbaum, S., Tillmann, B. N., & Winkler, D. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118006 · Cited by 88
Metadata
- Authors
- Elliott, R. E., Rodgers, S. D., Bassani, L., Morsi, A., Geller, E. B., Carlson, C., Devinsky, O., & Doyle, W. K.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics
- Published
- 2011-05
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 491-500
- ISSN
- 1933-0707 (ISSN-L)
- 1933-0715
- OpenAlex
- W1589660062
- Cited by
- 194
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vagus nerve stimulation for children with treatment-resistant epilepsy: a consecutive series of 141 cases: Clinical article. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/2011.2.peds10505
- The paper
- Elliott, R. E., Rodgers, S. D., Bassani, L., Morsi, A., Geller, E. B., Carlson, C., Devinsky, O., & Doyle, W. K. (2011). Vagus nerve stimulation for children with treatment-resistant epilepsy: a consecutive series of 141 cases: Clinical article. Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.peds10505
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.