Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 269

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vagus nerve stimulation for drug‐resistant epilepsy: A European long‐term study up to 24 months in 347 children

Open access
Orosz, Iren, McCormick, David, Zamponi, Nelia, Varadkar, Sophia, Feucht, Martha, Parain, Dominique, Griens, Roger, Vallée, Louis, Boon, Paul, Rittey, Christopher, Jayewardene, Amara K., Bunker, Mark, Arzimanoglou, Alexis, Lagae, Lieven·2014·Epilepsia

Abstract

Summary: Objective: To gain insight into the long‐term impact of vagus nerve stimulation (with VNS Therapy) in children with drug‐resistant epilepsy, we conducted the largest retrospective multicenter study to date over an extended follow‐up period of up to 24 months. Methods: The primary objective was to assess change in seizure frequency of the predominant seizure type (defined as the most disabling seizure) following VNS device implantation. Treating physicians collected data from patient records from baseline to 6, 12, and 24 months of follow‐up. Results: The analysis population included 347 children (aged 6 months to 17.9 years at the time of implant). At 6, 12, and 24 months after implantation, 32.5%, 37.6%, and 43.8%, respectively, of patients had ≥50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency of the predominant seizure type. The responder rate was higher in a subgroup of patients who had no change in antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during the study. Favorable results were also evident for all secondary outcome measures including changes in seizure duration, ictal severity, postictal severity, quality of life, clinical global impression of improvement, and safety. Post hoc analyses demonstrated a statistically significant correlation between VNS total charge delivered per day and an increase in response rate. VNS Therapy is indicated as adjunctive therapy in children with focal, structural epilepsies, who for any reason are not good candidates for surgical treatment following the trial of two or more AEDs. Children with predominantly generalized seizures from genetic, structural epilepsies, like Dravet syndrome or Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome, could also benefit from VNS Therapy. Significance: The results demonstrate that adjunctive VNS Therapy in children with drug‐resistant epilepsy reduces seizure frequency and is well tolerated over a 2‐year follow‐up period. No new safety issues were identified. A post hoc analysis revealed a dose–response correlation for VNS in patients with epilepsy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/epi.12762

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Cited by

See all 269

Metadata

Authors
Orosz, I., McCormick, D., Zamponi, N., Varadkar, S., Feucht, M., Parain, D., Griens, R., Vallée, L., Boon, P., Rittey, C., Jayewardene, A. K., Bunker, M., Arzimanoglou, A., & Lagae, L.
Venue
Epilepsia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-09-17
Volume
55
Issue
10
Pages
1576-1584
ISSN
  • 0013-9580 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-1167
OpenAlex
W2058764682
Cited by
269
References
27
FWCI
7.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vagus nerve stimulation for drug‐resistant epilepsy: A European long‐term study up to 24 months in 347 children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/epi.12762
The paper
Orosz, I., McCormick, D., Zamponi, N., Varadkar, S., Feucht, M., Parain, D., Griens, R., Vallée, L., Boon, P., Rittey, C., Jayewardene, A. K., Bunker, M., Arzimanoglou, A., & Lagae, L. (2014). Vagus nerve stimulation for drug‐resistant epilepsy: A European long‐term study up to 24 months in 347 children. Epilepsia. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.12762

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.