Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 251

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Convection-enhanced delivery of therapeutics for brain disease, and its optimization

Open access
Raghavan, Raghu, Brady, Martin L., Rodríguez-Ponce, María Inmaculada, Hartlep, Andreas, Pedain, Christoph, Sampson, John H.·2006·Neurosurgical Focus

Abstract

✓ Convection-enhanced delivery (CED) is the continuous injection under positive pressure of a fluid containing a therapeutic agent. This technique was proposed and introduced by researchers from the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) by the early 1990s to deliver drugs that would otherwise not cross the blood–brain barrier into the parenchyma and that would be too large to diffuse effectively over the required distances were they simply deposited into the tissue. Despite the many years that have elapsed, this technique remains experimental because of both the absence of approved drugs for intraparenchymal delivery and the difficulty of guaranteed delivery to delineated regions of the brain. During the first decade after the NIH researchers founded this analytical model of drug distribution, the results of several computer simulations that had been conducted according to more realistic assumptions were also published, revealing encouraging results. In the late 1990s, one of the authors of the present paper proposed the development of a computer model that would predict the distribution specific to a particular patient (brain) based on obtainable data from radiological images. Several key developments in imaging technology and, in particular, the relationships between image-obtained quantities and other parameters that enter models of the CED process have been required to implement this model. Note that delivery devices need further development. In the present paper we review key features of CED as well as modeling of the procedure and indulge in informed speculation on optimizing the direct delivery of therapeutic agents into brain tissue.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/foc.2006.20.4.7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 251

Metadata

Authors
Raghavan, R., Brady, M. L., Rodríguez-Ponce, M. I., Hartlep, A., Pedain, C., & Sampson, J. H.
Venue
Neurosurgical Focus
Published
2006-04
Volume
20
Issue
4
Pages
E12
ISSN
1092-0684 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2105060883
Cited by
251
References
2
FWCI
9.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Convection-enhanced delivery of therapeutics for brain disease, and its optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/foc.2006.20.4.7
The paper
Raghavan, R., Brady, M. L., Rodríguez-Ponce, M. I., Hartlep, A., Pedain, C., & Sampson, J. H. (2006). Convection-enhanced delivery of therapeutics for brain disease, and its optimization. Neurosurgical Focus. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2006.20.4.7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.