Cited by 92Epilepsy research and treatmentNeurological disorders and treatmentsMotor Control and Adaptation

Somatosensory, motor, and reaching/grasping responses to direct electrical stimulation of the human cingulate motor areas: Clinical article

Chassagnon, Serge, Minotti, Lorella, Kremer, Stéphane, Hoffmann, Dominique, Kahane, Philippe·2008·Journal of Neurosurgery

Abstract

Object Surgery for frontal lobe drug-resistant epilepsies is often limited by the apparent widespread distribution of the epileptogenic zone. Recent advances in the parcellation of the medial premotor cortex give the opportunity to reconsider "seizures of the supplementary motor area" (SMA), and to assess the contribution of cingulate motor areas (CMAs), SMA proper (SMAp), and pre-SMA to the symptomatology of premotor seizures. Methods The authors reviewed the results of extraoperative electrical stimulation (ES) applied in 52 candidates for epilepsy surgery who underwent stereotactic intracerebral electroencephalographic recordings, focusing on ES of the different medial premotor fields; that is, the anterior and posterior CMA, the SMAp, and the pre-SMA. The ES sites were localized by superposition of the postoperative lateral skull x-ray and the preoperative sagittal MR imaging studies. Results Among 94 electrodes reaching the medial premotor wall, 57 responses were obtained from the anterior CMA (13 cases), the posterior CMA (11), the pre-SMA (18), and the SMAp (15). The ES of the pre-SMA and SMAp gave rise most often to a combination of motor (31 cases), speech-related (22), or somatosensory (3) elementary symptoms. The ES of the CMA yielded simple (17 of 24) more often than complex responses (7 of 24), among which sensory symptoms (7) were overrepresented. Irrepressible exploratory reaching/grasping movements were elicited at the vicinity of the cingulate sulcus, from th…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3171/jns/2008/109/10/0593

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chassagnon, S., Minotti, L., Kremer, S., Hoffmann, D., & Kahane, P.
Affiliations
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
  • Pediatrics and Genetics (US)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR)
Corresponding author
Chassagnon, Serge
Venue
Journal of Neurosurgery
Published
2008-10
Volume
109
Issue
4
Pages
593-604
ISSN
  • 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
  • 1933-0693
OpenAlex
W1554433684
Cited by
92
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
cingulate motor area, supplementary motor area, pre-supplementary motor area, epileptogenic zone, drug-resistant epilepsy, epilepsy surgery, somatosensory responses, motor response, surgical outcome prediction
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Brain Mapping, Child, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Female, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motor Cortex, Somatosensory Cortex, Monitoring, Intraoperative, Treatment Outcome, Epilepsy, Frontal Lobe, Hand Strength, Evoked Potentials, Motor

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review