Cited by 128Advanced Control Systems OptimizationAdvanced Optimization Algorithms ResearchOptimization and Variational Analysis

NMPC without terminal constraints

Open access
Grüne, Lars·2012·IFAC Proceedings Volumes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3182/20120823-5-nl-3013.00030

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In existing MPC without terminal ingredients, prediction is based on a nominal model requiring identification of the nominal model with high precision, whereas the proposed IMPC employs the incremental model based on TDE and thus it is not necessary to identify the model of f(x) and g(x).

    “In existing MPC without terminal ingredients, comparing [17] and [18], the prediction is based on a nominal model. This requires to first identify the nominal model of the plant with high precision, whereas the proposed IMPC approach employs the incremental model based on TDE and, thus, it is not necessary to identify the model of f ( x ) and g ( x ) in (2b).”

    From Incremental Model Predictive Control Exploiting Time-Delay Estimation for a Robot Manipulator (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Due to uncertainties and/or disturbances, the Lyapunov stability established for the nominal system is not simply transferable, and input-to-state stability is required to be considered.

    “Due to uncertainties and/or disturbances, the Lyapunov stability that was established for the nominal system is not simply transferable [17], [18], and input-to-state stability (ISS), also known as practical Lyapunov stability, is required to be considered.”

    From Incremental Model Predictive Control Exploiting Time-Delay Estimation for a Robot Manipulator (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

    Section 3.2 (p. 4) establishes a Lyapunov function for the NMPC closed loop and concludes asymptotic stability under its stated assumptions. The passages found do not address whether that stability transfers to systems with uncertainties or disturbances, or say that input-to-state stability must be considered. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

This paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grüne, L.
Affiliations
University of Bayreuth (DE)
Corresponding author
Grüne, Lars
Venue
IFAC Proceedings Volumes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012
Volume
45
Issue
17
Pages
1-13
ISSN
1474-6670 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2045332133
Cited by
128
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 4
FWCI
11.29
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IFAC Proceedings Volumes (publishedVersion)
  • EPub Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • ERef Bayreuth (University of Bayreuth) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Advanced Control Systems Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Numerical Analysis › Advanced Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Optimization and Variational Analysis
Keywords
nonlinear model predictive control, terminal constraints, economic model predictive control, recursive feasibility, exponential convergence, stability analysis, performance evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review