Cited by 180Mental Health Treatment and AccessPrimary Care and Health OutcomesPsychology and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mental disorders in primary care

Open access
Wittchen, Hans-Ulrich, Mühlig, Stephan, Beesdo, Katja·2003·Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience

Abstract

Current estimates indicate that 50% of the population experience at least one mental disorder in their lifetime and that at least 25% have suffered a mental disorder in the past year. recognition, diagnosis, treatment, and referral depend overwhelmingly on general practitioners, at least one third of whose consultations have a direct and explicit psychological component. Yet despite this intensive familiarization with the presentation of mental pathology, and the appropriateness of the primary care setting to its management, even the most recent surveys indicate that performance is best described by the rule of diminishing halves: only half the patients with a thresh-old disorder are recognized; only half of those recognized are treated; and only half of those treated are effectively treated. There is no single solution to this problem, only multiple solutions, which must be aimed, consistently and simultaneously, at the patient, practitioner, practice, and research levels.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.31887/dcns.2003.5.2/huwittchen

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Andrade L., 2000, Bull World Health Organ,, 78, 413
  2. Jacob! F., Psychol Med. In press
  3. Ûstùn TB., 1995, Mental Illness in General Health Care: An International Study. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & sons;
  4. Linden M., 1996, Nervenarzt., 67, 205
  5. World Health Organization, 1992, The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders. Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization
  6. American Psychiatric Association, 1987, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd ed, revised. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association
  7. American Psychiatric Association, 1994, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association
  8. Heath I., 1999, BMJ., 318, 439
  9. Kroenke K., 1994, Arch FamMed., 3, 744
  10. Hirschfeld R., 1997, JAMA., 277, 333, 10.1001/jama.1997.03540280071036 · DOI
  11. Winter S., 2000, FortschrMed., 118, 11
  12. Wittchen HU., 2000, Fortschr Med., 118, 22
  13. Wittchen HU., 2002, J Clin Psychol., 63, 24
  14. Wittchen HU., 2002, Generalized Anxiety Disorder: Symptomatology Pathogenesis and Management. London, UK: Martin Dunitz, 11
  15. Greenberg PE., 1999, J Clin Psychol., 60, 427
  16. Goldberg DP., 1995, Mental Illness in General Health Care: an International Study. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 323
  17. Krause P., 2001, MMWFortsch Med., 119, 5
  18. Schmidt U., 2002, Mental Health in Primary Care. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
  19. King MB., 1989, Psychol Med., 14, 16
  20. Whitehouese AM., 1992, Br J Gen Pract., 42, 57
  21. Wittchen HU., 2002, Der Hausarzt., 8, 5
  22. Wittchen HU., 2003, Arterial Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus in General Practice. Dresden, Germany: Institut fur Klinische Psychologie und Psychothérapie der TU
  23. Goldberg D., 1999, J Clin Psychol., 60, 39
  24. Wittchen HU., 2003, MMW Fortschr Med., 121, 1
  25. Barkow K., J Affect Disord. In press
  26. Magruder KM., 1999, J Clin Psychol., 60, 45

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Wittchen, H.-U., Mühlig, S., & Beesdo, K.
Affiliations
  • Institute for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany; Max Planck Institute of Psychiatry, Clinical Psychology and Epidemiology, Munich, Germany
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Institute for Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany
Venue
Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
Published
2003-06-30
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
115-128
ISSN
  • 1294-8322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1958-5969
OpenAlex
W4294947750
Cited by
180
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
mental illness, primary care, general practitioners, mental health service utilization, underdiagnosis, treatment effectiveness, referral, psychological consultation, mental health service delivery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review