The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Research Domain Criteria: toward future psychiatric nosologies
Open accessAbstract
The Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) project was initiated by the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) in early 2009 as the implementation of Goal 1.4 of its just-issued strategic plan. In keeping with the NIMH mission, to "transform the understanding and treatment of mental illnesses through basic and clinical research," RDoC was explicitly conceived as a research-related initiative. The statement of the relevant goal in the strategic plan reads: "Develop, for research purposes, new ways of classifying mental disorders based on dimensions of observable behavior and neurobiological measures." Due to the novel approach that RDoC takes to conceptualizing and studying mental disorders, it has received widespread attention, well beyond the borders of the immediate research community. This review discusses the rationale for the experimental framework that RDoC has adopted, and its implications for the nosology of mental disorders in the future.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Olds, J., & Milner, P. (1954) · Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0058775 · Cited by 3,176
Toward the future of psychiatric diagnosis: the seven pillars of RDoC
Cuthbert, B. N., & Insel, T. R. (2013) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-11-126 · Cited by 3,053
Self-citation(2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62129-1 · Cited by 3,010
The Path to Personalized Medicine
Hamburg, M. A., & Collins, F. S. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1006304 · Cited by 1,970
Multiple reward signals in the brain
Schultz, W. (2000) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35044563 · Cited by 1,303
The Diagnosis of Mental Disorders: The Problem of Reification
Hyman, S. E. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091532 · Cited by 1,052
Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: a dual-process framework.
Gyurak, A., Gross, J. J., & Etkin, A. (2011) · Cognition and Emotion · doi:10.1080/02699931.2010.544160 · Cited by 1,015
Kapur, S., Phillips, A. G., & Insel, T. R. (2012) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/mp.2012.105 · Cited by 980
Krueger, R. F., Markon, K. E., Patrick, C. J., Benning, S. D., & Kramer, M. D. (2007) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.116.4.645 · Cited by 861
Research Domain Criteria: cognitive systems, neural circuits, and dimensions of behavior
Morris, S. E., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2012) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2012.14.1/smorris · Cited by 638
Self-citationCan neuroscience be integrated into the DSM-V?
Hyman, S. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2218 · Cited by 516
Concannon, P., Rich, S. S., & Nepom, G. T. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra0808284 · Cited by 510
The Conceptual Development of DSM-V
Regier, D. A., Narrow, W. E., Kuhl, E. A., & Kupfer, D. J. (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09020279 · Cited by 432
A Neurodevelopmental Perspective on the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) Framework
Casey, B. J., Oliveri, M. E., & Insel, T. (2014) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2014.01.006 · Cited by 369
Cited by
Thapar, A., Cooper, M., & Rutter, M. (2017) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(16)30376-5 · Cited by 903
Transdiagnostic approaches to mental health problems: Current status and future directions.
Dalgleish, T., Black, M., Johnston, D., & Bevan, A. (2020) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000482 · Cited by 883
Neuropsychiatric signs and symptoms of Alzheimer's disease: New treatment paradigms
Lanctôt, K. L., Amatniek, J., Ancoli‐Israel, S., Arnold, S. E., Ballard, C., Cohen‐Mansfield, J., Ismail, Z., Lyketsos, C., Miller, D. S., Musiek, E., et al. (2017) · Alzheimer's & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.trci.2017.07.001 · Cited by 395
Faraone, S. V., Rostain, A. L., Blader, J., Busch, B., Childress, A. C., Connor, D. F., & Newcorn, J. H. (2019) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12899 · Cited by 400
Psychiatric genetics and the structure of psychopathology
Smoller, J. W., Andreassen, O. A., Edenberg, H. J., Faraone, S. V., Glatt, S. J., & Kendler, K. S. (2019) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-017-0010-4 · Cited by 398
Metadata
- Authors
- Cuthbert, B. N.
- Venue
- Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2015-03-31
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 89-97
- ISSN
- 1294-8322 (ISSN-L)
- 1958-5969
- OpenAlex
- W2412112752
- Cited by
- 331
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 255.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
