High-Risk Drinking Among College Fraternity Members: A National Perspective
Abstract
This survey, with its 85% response rate, provides an extensive profile of drinking behaviors and predictors of drinking among 3,406 members of one national college fraternity, distributed across 98 chapters in 32 states. Multiple indexes of alcohol consumption measured frequency, quantity, estimated blood alcohol concentration levels (BACs), and related problems. Among all members, 97% were drinkers, 86% binge drinkers, and 64% frequent binge drinkers. On the basis of self-reports concerning the 4 weeks preceding the time of survey, the authors found that members drank on an average of 10.5 days and consumed an average of 81 drinks. Drinkers had an average BAC of 0.10, reaching at least 0.08 on an average of 6 days. These fraternity members appear to be heavier drinkers than previously studied fraternity samples, perhaps because they were more representative and forthright. All 6 preselected demographic attributes of members and 2 chapter characteristics were significantly related to the drinking behaviors and levels of risk, identifying possible targets for preventive interventions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
As a result of increased alcohol consumption, affiliated members reported higher levels of unsafe behaviors, such as unprotected sexual encounters, physical altercations, driving while under the influence of alcohol, and vandalism of property.
“As a result of their increased alcohol consumption, affiliated members also reported higher levels of unsafe behaviors, such as unprotected sexual encounters, physical altercations, driving while under the influence of alcohol, and vandalism of property (Barry, 2007;Caudill et al., 2006;Danielson, Taylor, & Hartford, 2001;DeSimone, 2009;Perkins et al., 2011).”
From Declining Participation in Fraternity and Sorority Life: a Comparison of Perceptions of Greek-lettered Organizations Between Affiliated and Non-affiliated Students (2025) · cites this paper as Caudill et al., 2006
Cites
Sobell, L. C., & Sobell, M. B. (1992) · Measuring Alcohol Consumption · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-0357-5_3 · Cited by 4,110 · see citing works
Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking
White, H. R., & Labouvie, E. W. (1989) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1989.50.30 · Cited by 1,693 · see citing works
Alcohol use in the Greek system: follow the leader?
Cashin, J. R., Presley, C. A., & Meilman, P. W. (1998) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.1998.59.63 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Understanding Fraternity Drinking: Five Recurring Themes in the Literature, 1980–1998
Borsari, B. E., & Carey, K. B. (1999) · Journal of American College Health · doi:10.1080/07448489909595669 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Larimer, M. E., Anderson, B. K., Baer, J. S., & Marlatt, G. A. (2000) · Journal of Substance Abuse · doi:10.1016/s0899-3289(99)00020-6 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Caudill, B. D., Luckey, B., Crosse, S. B., Blane, H. T., Ginexi, E. M., & Campbell, B. (2007) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2007.68.399 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Caudill, B. D., Luckey, B., Crosse, S. B., Blane, H. T., Ginexi, E. M., & Campbell, B. (2007) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs · doi:10.15288/jsad.2007.68.399 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Self-citationShirley, Z. E. (2025) · University of North Texas Dissertation · doi:10.12794/metadc500187
- Authors
- Caudill, B. D., Crosse, S. B., Campbell, B., Howard, J., Luckey, B., & Blane, H. T.
- Venue
- Journal of American College Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-11
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 141-155
- ISSN
- 0744-8481
- 1940-3208
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review