The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 40 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of a Resilience Intervention to Enhance Coping Strategies and Protective Factors and Decrease Symptomatology
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In this pilot study, the authors examined the effectiveness of a 4-week resilience intervention to enhance resilience, coping strategies, and protective factors, as well as decrease symptomatology during a period of increased academic stress. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: College students were randomly assigned to experimental (n = 30) and wait-list control (n = 27) groups. The experimental group received a psychoeducational intervention in 4 two-hour weekly sessions. Measures of resilience, coping strategies, protective factors, and symptomatology were administered pre- and postintervention to both groups. RESULTS: Analyses indicated that the experimental group had significantly higher resilience scores, more effective coping strategies (i.e., higher problem solving, lower avoidant), higher scores on protective factors (i.e., positive affect, self-esteem, self-leadership), and lower scores on symptomatology (i.e., depressive symptoms, negative affect, perceived stress) postintervention than did the wait-list control group. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that this resilience program may be useful as a stress-management and stress-prevention intervention for college students.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions [8–11], as well as mindfulness and acceptance-based approaches [12, 13], have produced efficacious results in college settings.”
Citations
Cites
The CES-D Scale: A Self-Report Depression Scale for Research in the General Population
Radloff, L. S. (1977) · Applied Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/014662167700100306 · Cited by 53,267
Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.
Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 · Cited by 32,433
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image
Rosenberg, M. (1965) · doi:10.1515/9781400876136 · Cited by 30,126
“Stress: appraisal and coping,”
Folkman, S. (2013) · Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_215 · Cited by 27,833
Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)
Connor, K. M., & Davidson, J. R. T. (2003) · Depression and Anxiety · doi:10.1002/da.10113 · Cited by 11,793
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063 · Cited by 7,456
You want to measure coping but your protocol’ too long: Consider the brief cope
Carver, C. S. (1997) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1207/s15327558ijbm0401_6 · Cited by 7,361
(1988) · Cited by 4,111
Resilient Individuals Use Positive Emotions to Bounce Back From Negative Emotional Experiences.
Tugade, M. M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.320 · Cited by 3,947
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Davydov, D. M., Stewart, R., Ritchie, K., & Chaudieu, I. (2010) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.03.003 · Cited by 1,189
“Key words: psychological resilience; mental health; mental disorders; immunity model”
Joyce, S., Shand, F., Tighe, J., Laurent, S. J., Bryant, R. A., & Harvey, S. B. (2018) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017858 · Cited by 864
Towards a Transversal Definition of Psychological Resilience: A Literature Review
Sisto, A., Vicinanza, F., Campanozzi, L. L., Ricci, G., Tartaglini, D., & Tambone, V. (2019) · Medicina · doi:10.3390/medicina55110745 · Cited by 547
“Dale [158]; De Santis [159]; Kent [160]; Steinhardt [161] 3.5.”
BackgroundInfluentialA systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological interventions to improve mental wellbeing
van Agteren, J., Iasiello, M., Lo, L., Bartholomaeus, J., Kopsaftis, Z., Carey, M., & Kyrios, M. (2021) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01093-w · Cited by 510
Sood, A., Prasad, K., Schroeder, D., & Varkey, P. (2011) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1640-x · Cited by 410
“The effect size of the intervention was large (approximately one standard deviation) and comparable to other resiliency training interventions.(15,18,30,31) In the original validation study, psychiatric outpatients scored 68 on the CD-RISC, while the US general population scored 80.”
Result
Metadata
- Authors
- Steinhardt, M., & Dolbier, C.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- East Carolina University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of American College Health
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 445-453
- ISSN
- 0164-4300 (ISSN-L)
- 0744-8481
- 1940-3208
- OpenAlex
- W1966828258
- Cited by
- 759
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 38 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 25.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of American College Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Texas at Austin
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Resilience and Mental Health
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Keywords
- resilience interventions, coping strategies, protective factors, academic stress, university students, psychoeducational intervention, stress management, stress prevention, depressive symptoms, perceived stress, self-esteem, self-leadership, positive affect, avoidance coping
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Psychological, Adolescent, Adult, Depression, Female, Health Education, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Stress, Psychological
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
