Cited by 166Child Abuse and TraumaEducation Discipline and InequalityChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

A Meta-Analysis of the Published Research on the Affective, Cognitive, and Behavioral Effects of Corporal Punishment

Paolucci, Elizabeth Oddone, Violato, Claudio·2004·The Journal of Psychology

Abstract

The present study is a meta-analysis of the published research on the effects of corporal punishment on affective, cognitive, and behavioral outcomes. The authors included 70 studies published between 1961 and 2000 and involving 47,751 people. Most of the studies were published between 1990 and 2000 (i.e., 53 or 68%) and were conducted in the United States (65 or 83.3%). Each of the dependent variables was coded, and effect sizes (ds) were computed. Average unweighted and weighted ds for each of the outcome variables were .35 and .20 for affective outcomes, .33 and .06 for cognitive outcomes, and .25 and .21 for behavioral outcomes, respectively. The analyses suggested small negative behavioral and emotional effects of corporal punishment and almost no effect of such punishment on cognition. Analyses of several potentially moderating variables, such as gender or socioeconomic status, and the frequency or age of first experience of corporal punishment, the relationship of the person administering the discipline, and the technique of the discipline all had no affect on effect size outcome. There was insufficient data about a number of the moderator variables to conduct meaningful analyses. The results of the present meta-analysis suggest that exposure to corporal punishment does not substantially increase the risk to youth of developing affective, cognitive, or behavioral pathologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3200/jrlp.138.3.197-222

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Across the earlier meta-analyses, physical punishment was associated with negative child outcomes, especially when outcomes were analyzed in finer-grained categories rather than broad ones.

    “Taken together, these meta-analyses provide evidence that physical punishment is associated with negative child outcomes, particularly when the outcomes are divided into finer-grained categories (Ferguson, 2013; Gershoff, 2002) rather than when they are grouped into broad categories (Paolucci & Violato, 2004), and that harsher methods of physical punishment are more strongly associated with”

    From Spanking and child outcomes: Old controversies and new meta-analyses. (2016) · cites this paper as Paolucci & Violato, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Paolucci, E. O., & Violato, C.
Affiliations
University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
The Journal of Psychology
Published
2004-01
Volume
138
Issue
3
Pages
197-222
ISSN
  • 0022-3980 (ISSN-L)
  • 1940-1019
OpenAlex
W2083574489
Cited by
166
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 10
FWCI
0.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Discipline and Inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
corporal punishment, spanking, child discipline, affective learning outcomes, emotional impact, cognitive effects, behavioral effects, child development, socioeconomic status, gender differences, parent-child relationship
MeSH terms
Affect, Cognition, Humans, Punishment, Social Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review