Cited by 152Zoonotic diseases and public healthInfection Control in HealthcareInterprofessional Education and Collaboration

Preventing Zoonotic Diseases in Immunocompromised Persons: The Role of Physicians and Veterinarians

Open access
Grant, Sara, Olsen, Christopher W.·1999·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract

We surveyed physicians and veterinarians in Wisconsin about the risk for and prevention of zoonotic diseases in immunocompromised persons. We found that physicians and veterinarians hold significantly different views about the risks posed by certain infectious agents and species of animals and communicate very little about zoonotic issues; moreover, physicians believe that veterinarians should be involved in many aspects of zoonotic disease prevention, including patient education.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid0501.990121

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Surveys suggest that most veterinarians and physicians do not regularly discuss zoonotic disease risks with clients, patients or each other.

    “Surveys suggest that most veterinarians and physicians do not regularly discuss zoonotic disease risks with clients, patients or each other. 4,37”

    From Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections (2015) · cites this paper as [37]

    The survey reports that physicians encountered or discussed zoonotic diseases only occasionally on average (Table 2, p. 162), and concludes that communication between physicians and veterinarians was largely absent (p. 163). It does not establish that most veterinarians rarely discuss risks with clients: the combined 'encounter or discuss' question averaged about weekly for veterinarians (Table 1, p. 161) and does not measure client discussions separately. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Veterinarians may not be aware of the immune status of a pet owner who should receive counselling on safe pet ownership.

    “Furthermore, veterinarians may not be aware of the immune status of a pet owner who should receive counselling on safe pet ownership. 37”

    From Reducing the risk of pet-associated zoonotic infections (2015) · cites this paper as [37]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grant, S., & Olsen, C. W.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
1999-02
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
159-163
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W2037928103
Cited by
152
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Emerging infectious diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Geraldine R. Dodge Foundation
  • Bernice Barbour Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
Keywords
zoonoses, immunocompromised patients, disease prevention, risk perception, patient education
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Domestic, Bacterial Infections, Data Collection, Humans, Mycoses, Parasitic Diseases, Physicians, Risk Factors, Virus Diseases, Zoonoses, Immunocompromised Host, Veterinarians

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review