The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Outcomes of Streptococcus suis Infection in Humans
Open accessAbstract
Streptococcus suis, a bacterium that affects pigs, is a neglected pathogen that causes systemic disease in humans.We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize global estimates of the epidemiology, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of this zoonosis.We searched main literature databases for all studies through December 2012 using the search term "streptococcus suis."The prevalence of S. suis infection is highest in Asia; the primary risk factors are occupational exposure and eating of contaminated food.The pooled proportions of case-patients with pig-related occupations and history of eating high-risk food were 38.1% and 37.3%, respectively.The main clinical syndrome was meningitis (pooled rate 68.0%), followed by sepsis, arthritis, endocarditis, and endophthalmitis.The pooled case-fatality rate was 12.8%.Sequelae included hearing loss (39.1%) and vestibular dysfunction (22.7%).Our analysis identified gaps in the literature, particularly in assessing risk factors and sequelae of this infection.S treptococcus suis is a neglected zoonotic pathogen that has caused large outbreaks of sepsis in China (1,2) and has been identified as the most common and the third leading cause of bacterial meningitis in adults in Vietnam and Hong Kong, respectively (3-5).S. suis infection is acquired from pigs, either during slaughtering or by handling and eating undercooked pork products.It is potentially preventable (3,6).Epidemiology of the infection differs between Western and Asian regions (7), and the role of high-risk eating habits (i.e., ingesting raw or undercooked pig parts, including pig blood, organs, and meat) in some Asian communities recently has been recognized (6,8,9).Rates of S. suis infection are low in the general populations of Europe and North America, and cases are concentrated among occupationally exposed groups, including abattoir workers, butchers, and pig breeders (10,11).In a 2009 review, ≈700 S. suis infections were reported worldwide by 2009, mostly from China and Vietnam (12).Clinical characteristics of this infection have been reviewed (12,13) and include meningitis, sepsis, endocarditis, arthritis, hearing loss, and skin lesions.Treatment of S. suis infection requires ≈2 weeks of intravenous antimicrobial drugs (12).The death rate varies, and deafness is a common sequela in survivors.Although substantial new data on the incidence, clinical and microbiological characteristics, and risk factors for S. suis infection have accumulated during recent years, the prevalence of this infection has not measurably decreased.We conducted a systematic review and metaanalysis to update the evidence and summarize the estimates of epidemiologic and clinical parameters to support practitioners' and policy makers' efforts to prevent and control this infection.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
Wang, G., Ma, R., Qiao, G., Wada, K., Aizawa, Y., & Satoh, T. (2015) · Integrative Medicine International · doi:10.1159/000368408 · Cited by 18,657
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Estimating the mean and variance from the median, range, and the size of a sample
Hozo, S. P., Djulbegovic, B., & Hozo, I. (2005) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-5-13 · Cited by 9,062
Cited by
Acute bacterial meningitis in adults
McGill, F., Heyderman, R. S., Panagiotou, S., Tunkel, A. R., & Solomon, T. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30654-7 · Cited by 274
Metadata
- Authors
- Huong, V. T. L., Ha, N., Huy, N. T., Horby, P., Nghia, H. D. T., Thiem, V. D., Zhu, X., Hoa, N. T., Hien, T. T., Zamora, J., Schultsz, C., Wertheim, H. F. L., & Hirayama, K.
- Venue
- Emerging Infectious Diseases
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1105-14
- ISSN
- 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
- 1080-6059
- OpenAlex
- W2076971528
- Cited by
- 300
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 18.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Outcomes of Streptococcus suis Infection in Humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3201/eid2007.131594
- The paper
- Huong, V. T. L., Ha, N., Huy, N. T., Horby, P., Nghia, H. D. T., Thiem, V. D., Zhu, X., Hoa, N. T., Hien, T. T., Zamora, J., Schultsz, C., Wertheim, H. F. L., & Hirayama, K. (2014). Epidemiology, Clinical Manifestations, and Outcomes of Streptococcus suis Infection in Humans. Emerging Infectious Diseases. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2007.131594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.