The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Biorheology of soft tissues1
Abstract
To understand the physiological function of vital organs we must know the mechanical properties of the tissues. Experimental determination of the mechanical properties of living tissues has many difficulties, such as the small size, large deformation, active contraction, damage due to dissection, i naccessibility or non-existence of a “natural” state, and the necessity of keeping the specimens alive. In this paper, major features of the rheology of soft tissues obtained in our laboratory are summarized, and a mathematical description is offered to serve as a starting point for the analysis of the function of the organs. Almost all published rheological data on soft tissues were obtained in one-dimensional condition—simple elongation of a slender cylindrical body, strip-biaxial or homogeneous—biaxial tension of a membrane. Recently we have collected data on two-dimensional testing of the skin, and torsion of the mesentery. From these we propose the following stress (σij)-strain (eij) relation for such tissues as the skin, the mesentery, and the muscle in the passive state, when subjected to loading and unloading at a constant rate σij=Cijkl′ekl+Cijkleklexp{amn(emn−emn(0))+b(J2−J2(0))δij}+pδi where J2=16[(e11−e22)2+(e22−e33)2+(e33−e11)2]+e122+e232+e312 is the second strain invarient; x1, x2, x3 are axes of orthotropic symmetry, Cijkl, Cijkl′ are orthotropic tensors of rank 4 familiar in the classical theory of elasticity, amn and b are constants which differ in loading from unloading (defined by whether ∂(amnemn+bJ2)/∂t is positive or negative), but are only slightly dependent on the strain rate. This equation does not apply to highly structured tissues such as blood vessels or the lung. amn emn(0) and J2(0) are the largest values of these strain invariants for which the formulas are expected to be applicable. The indexes range over 1, 2, 3. For membranes in plane stress the indexes range over 1, 2 and the p term should be deleted. The summation convention over a repeated index is used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Review Paper: Continuum biomechanics of soft biological tissues
Humphrey, J. D. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2002.1060 · Cited by 620
Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar?
Gefen, A., & Margulies, S. S. (2004) · Journal of Biomechanics · doi:10.1016/j.jbiomech.2003.12.032 · Cited by 417
Yin, F. C. (1981) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/01.res.49.4.829 · Cited by 374
Human tendon behaviour and adaptation, in vivo
Magnusson, S. P., Narici, M. V., Maganaris, C. N., & Kjaer, M. (2008) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2007.139105 · Cited by 330
Fatigue resistance of aligned carbon nanotube arrays under cyclic compression
Suhr, J., Victor, P., Ci, L., Sreekala, S., Zhang, X., Nalamasu, O., & Ajayan, P. M. (2007) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.186 · Cited by 306
Metadata
- Authors
- Fung, Y.-C. B.
- Venue
- Biorheology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1973-06-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 139-155
- ISSN
- 0006-355X (ISSN-L)
- 1878-5034
- OpenAlex
- W172962529
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biorheology of soft tissues1. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3233/bir-1973-10208
- The paper
- Fung, Y.-C. B. (1973). Biorheology of soft tissues1. Biorheology. https://doi.org/10.3233/bir-1973-10208
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.