Cited by 46Pain Management and TreatmentSpinal Cord Injury ResearchPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Effects of visual illusion and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury: A randomised controlled cross-over trial

Özkul, Çağla, Kılınç, Muhammed, Yıldırım, Sibel Aksu, Topçuoğlu, Elif Yalçın, Akyüz, Müfit·2015·Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is a common consequence of spinal cord injury (SCI). No therapeutic drugs or drug groups are proven to be superior for neuropathic pain and treatments only aim to convert pain from dull to tolerable levels and not to remove it. OBJECTIVE: This study was planned to compare the effect of visual illusion (VI) and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on pain intensity, pain quality and functional capacity in SCI patients with neuropathic pain. METHODS: Twenty-four patients were included and randomly categorized into two groups. In the first group (n= 12), visual illusion was applied for first two weeks, 1 week wash out period and then TENS was applied for 2 weeks. In second group (n= 12), TENS was applied firstly, 1 week wash out and then %visual illusion VI were applied. Pain severity, pain quality, and functional capacity were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS), the neuropathic pain scale (NPS), and the brief pain inventory (BPI), respectively. A pre-post-treatment and cross over design was used. RESULTS: Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for within group analyses. Mann-Whitney U tests were used for analyses that compared different groups. It was observed that pain intensity decrease immediately after both applications (VI: p= 0.07, TENS: p= 0.08). After TENS application for 2 weeks, it was observed that significant decrease in most (p= 0.04) and less (p= 0.02) pain intensity; while there was no significant decrease in pain intensity after 2 weeks for VI (p> 0.05). When findings of NPS were analyzed, hot (p= 0.047), sharp (p= 0.02), unpleasant (p= 0.03) and deep items (p= 0.047) decreased after VI application. When the results of BPI were detected, they were observed that the negative effect of pain on moving ability (p= 0.04) after visual illusion application and the negative effect of pain on mood (p= 0.03), relationships with others (p= 0.04) and sleep (p= 0.04) after TENS application decreased significantly. CONCLUSION: TENS and VI therapies can be successfully used in clinical practice as an alternative treatment or as a supportive method separetely or together.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/bmr-140573

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some studies, a mirror was used with a video projection of walking legs; in others, walking stimuli consisted of a video of an actor in first-person view walking along a path; and in another, participants viewed their virtual arms and legs in first person view in a virtual world through a head-mounted display.

    “In some studies, a mirror was used with a video projection of walking legs [7, 15–17], in others the walking stimuli consisted of a video of an actor, in first-person view, walking along a path [18, 19] and in the last one participants viewed their virtual arms and legs in first person view in a virtual world through a head-mounted display [20].”
  • The different studies regarding VW did not discuss therapy adherence.

    “The different studies regarding VW did not discuss therapy adherence [7, 15–20].”
  • Third-person perspective has already been described, while first-person perspective was also applied.

    “Third-person perspective has already been described [7], [15–17], while first-person perspective was also applied [18–20].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Özkul, Ç., Kılınç, M., Yıldırım, S. A., Topçuoğlu, E. Y., & Akyüz, M.
Affiliations
  • Gazi University (TR)
  • Hacettepe University (TR)
  • Ankara Fizik Tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Corresponding author
Kılınç, Muhammed
Venue
Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation
Published
2015-12-02
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
709-719
ISSN
  • 1053-8127 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-6324
OpenAlex
W2237663473
Cited by
46
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
optical illusions, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, neuropathic pain, spinal cord injury, chronic pain, pain intensity, pain quality, functional capacity, sleep disorders
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation, Equipment Design, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Illusions, Male, Middle Aged, Neuralgia, Pain Measurement, Retrospective Studies, Spinal Cord Injuries, Time Factors, Cross-Over Studies, Physical Therapy Modalities, Young Adult, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review